DETERMINATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS FOR DISASTER EMERGENCY IN INDONESIA

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Teuku Ahmad Dadek, H. Husni, Mahdi Syahbandir, M. A. Aiyub Kadir, Yanis Rinaldi, S. Sulaiman
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS FOR DISASTER EMERGENCY IN INDONESIA","authors":"Teuku Ahmad Dadek, H. Husni, Mahdi Syahbandir, M. A. Aiyub Kadir, Yanis Rinaldi, S. Sulaiman","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law Number 24 Year 2007 concerning Disaster Management (UUPB) stipulates that the establishment of a disaster emergency status must contain indicators that include the number of victims, property loss, the damage of the infrastructure and facilities, the extent to which an area is affected by the disaster and the socio-economic impacts that arise. Paragraph (3) of the article states that further provisions regarding the establishment of the status and the level of the disaster are regulated through a Presidential Regulation. However, the Presidential Regulation has not yet been issued while the Letter of Decision on the Disaster Emergency Status continues to be published, which causes legal uncertainty in its implementation. Hence this article investigates the legal mechanism in determining a disaster emergency status that guarantees legal certainty, its legal implications, and steps the (central) Government and the Regional Government should take in dealing with such legal implications. The research method employed in this study is the juridical normative research. Research on disaster legislation, especially in determining disaster emergency status, has not yet demonstrated legal certainty. This is due to the absence of legal mechanisms and positive legal formalities that are built from legal facts that lead to multiple interpretations and to legal disputes. The absence of the Presidential Regulation (Perpres) as a UUPB manifestation for determining the emergency status of a disaster as stipulated by autonomous provinces/districts (Decree) has contributed to the potential arbitrary use of state funds. Therefore, the Presidential regulation is urgently required.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law Number 24 Year 2007 concerning Disaster Management (UUPB) stipulates that the establishment of a disaster emergency status must contain indicators that include the number of victims, property loss, the damage of the infrastructure and facilities, the extent to which an area is affected by the disaster and the socio-economic impacts that arise. Paragraph (3) of the article states that further provisions regarding the establishment of the status and the level of the disaster are regulated through a Presidential Regulation. However, the Presidential Regulation has not yet been issued while the Letter of Decision on the Disaster Emergency Status continues to be published, which causes legal uncertainty in its implementation. Hence this article investigates the legal mechanism in determining a disaster emergency status that guarantees legal certainty, its legal implications, and steps the (central) Government and the Regional Government should take in dealing with such legal implications. The research method employed in this study is the juridical normative research. Research on disaster legislation, especially in determining disaster emergency status, has not yet demonstrated legal certainty. This is due to the absence of legal mechanisms and positive legal formalities that are built from legal facts that lead to multiple interpretations and to legal disputes. The absence of the Presidential Regulation (Perpres) as a UUPB manifestation for determining the emergency status of a disaster as stipulated by autonomous provinces/districts (Decree) has contributed to the potential arbitrary use of state funds. Therefore, the Presidential regulation is urgently required.
确定印度尼西亚紧急灾害的法律地位
2007年第24号《灾害管理法》第7条第(2)款规定,建立灾害紧急状态必须包含受害者人数、财产损失、基础设施和设施损坏、一个地区受灾害影响的程度以及由此产生的社会经济影响等指标。该条第(3)款规定,关于确定灾害状况和级别的进一步规定由《总统条例》规定。然而,《总统条例》尚未发布,而《关于灾害紧急状态的决定书》仍在发布,这导致其执行过程中存在法律不确定性。因此,本文调查了确定灾害紧急状态的法律机制,以确保法律确定性、其法律影响,以及(中央)政府和地区政府在处理此类法律影响时应采取的步骤。本研究所采用的研究方法是司法规范研究。对灾害立法的研究,特别是在确定灾害紧急状态方面的研究,尚未证明法律的确定性。这是由于缺乏建立在法律事实基础上的法律机制和积极的法律手续,从而导致多种解释和法律纠纷。没有按照自治省/区(法令)的规定,将《总统条例》(Perpres)作为确定灾害紧急状态的UUPB表现,导致了国家资金的潜在任意使用。因此,迫切需要总统条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信