Embodied Movement as Method: Attuning to Affect as Feminist Experimentation

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
S. Fullagar, A. Pavlidis, A. Hickey-Moody, Julia E. Coffey
{"title":"Embodied Movement as Method: Attuning to Affect as Feminist Experimentation","authors":"S. Fullagar, A. Pavlidis, A. Hickey-Moody, Julia E. Coffey","doi":"10.3366/soma.2021.0350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores qualitative research methods that employ materiality and movement, images and body mapping to access research participant knowledges. We examine a methodologies workshop that we co-facilitated for academics and postgraduates. We position the workshop as a research assemblage, through which we facilitated four different methodological ‘moves’, to borrow from Barad's (2007) notion of ‘cuts’, to invite learning-knowing through the movement of affect. These embodied methodologies included: moving-writing sport, digital photovoice, movement improvisation, and body mapping somatic movement. Workshop participants were invited to experiment with each method as a means of engaging with tacit, or difficult to articulate knowledges. By exploring what these embodied ‘moves’ do to our ways of knowing, we traced the affective relations that entangle human and nonhuman worlds, self and others, researcher and researched through the workshop intra-actions. Our accounts of each method are diffracted through affective relations as we attune to bodies, vulnerabilities, openings, objects, texts, thoughts, surfaces, and senses, as means of (un)learning together. We articulate the kinds of productive (un)learning that moved us in different ways, and how embodied, feminist new materialist approaches might contribute to defamiliarised approaches to research.","PeriodicalId":43420,"journal":{"name":"Somatechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2021.0350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This article explores qualitative research methods that employ materiality and movement, images and body mapping to access research participant knowledges. We examine a methodologies workshop that we co-facilitated for academics and postgraduates. We position the workshop as a research assemblage, through which we facilitated four different methodological ‘moves’, to borrow from Barad's (2007) notion of ‘cuts’, to invite learning-knowing through the movement of affect. These embodied methodologies included: moving-writing sport, digital photovoice, movement improvisation, and body mapping somatic movement. Workshop participants were invited to experiment with each method as a means of engaging with tacit, or difficult to articulate knowledges. By exploring what these embodied ‘moves’ do to our ways of knowing, we traced the affective relations that entangle human and nonhuman worlds, self and others, researcher and researched through the workshop intra-actions. Our accounts of each method are diffracted through affective relations as we attune to bodies, vulnerabilities, openings, objects, texts, thoughts, surfaces, and senses, as means of (un)learning together. We articulate the kinds of productive (un)learning that moved us in different ways, and how embodied, feminist new materialist approaches might contribute to defamiliarised approaches to research.
作为方法的具身运动:作为女权主义实验的调谐影响
本文探讨了定性研究方法,利用物质性和运动,图像和身体映射来获取研究参与者的知识。我们考察了我们共同为学者和研究生举办的方法论研讨会。我们将研讨会定位为一个研究组合,通过它,我们促进了四种不同的方法论“动作”,借用Barad(2007)的“切割”概念,通过情感的运动来邀请学习-认识。这些具体的方法包括:移动书写运动、数字影像语音、动作即兴和身体映射身体运动。研讨会的参与者被邀请去实验每一种方法,作为一种接触隐性知识或难以表达的知识的手段。通过探索这些具体的“动作”对我们的认知方式的影响,我们追溯了人类和非人类世界、自我和他人、研究者和研究人员之间的情感关系。我们对每种方法的描述都是通过情感关系进行衍射的,因为我们将身体、弱点、开口、物体、文本、思想、表面和感官作为共同学习的手段。我们阐明了以不同方式感动我们的生产性(非)学习的种类,以及具体的、女权主义的新唯物主义方法如何有助于陌生化的研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Somatechnics
Somatechnics SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信