Quality adjusted GEKS-type indices for price comparisons based on scanner data

Q4 Mathematics
Jacek Białek
{"title":"Quality adjusted GEKS-type indices for price comparisons based on scanner\n data","authors":"Jacek Białek","doi":"10.59170/stattrans-2023-041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A wide variety of retailers (supermarkets, home electronics, Internet shops, etc.)\n provide scanner data containing information at the level of the barcode, e.g. the Global\n Trade Item Number (GTIN). As scanner data provide complete transaction information, we\n may use the expenditure shares of items as weightsfor calculating price indices at the\n lowest (elementary) level of data aggregation. The challenge here is the choice of the\n index formula which should be able to reduce chain drift bias and substitution bias.\n Multilateral index methods seem to be the best choice due to the dynamic character of\n scanner data. These indices work on a wholetime window and are transitive, which is key\n to the elimination of the chain drift effect. Following what is called an identity test,\n however, it may be expected that even when only prices return to their original values,\n the index becomes one. Unfortunately, the commonly used multilateral indices (GEKS,\n CCDI, GK, TPD, TDH) do not meet the identity test. The paper discusses the proposal of\n two multilateral indices and their weighted versions. On the one hand, the design of the\n proposed indices is based on the idea of the GEKS index. On the other hand, similarly to\n the Geary-Khamis method, it requires quality adjusting. It is shown that the proposed\n indices meet the identity test and most other tests. In an empirical and simulation\n study, these indices are compared with the SPQ index, which is relatively new and also\n meets the identity test. The analytical considerations as well as empirical studies\n confirm the high usefulness of the proposed indices.","PeriodicalId":37985,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Transition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59170/stattrans-2023-041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A wide variety of retailers (supermarkets, home electronics, Internet shops, etc.) provide scanner data containing information at the level of the barcode, e.g. the Global Trade Item Number (GTIN). As scanner data provide complete transaction information, we may use the expenditure shares of items as weightsfor calculating price indices at the lowest (elementary) level of data aggregation. The challenge here is the choice of the index formula which should be able to reduce chain drift bias and substitution bias. Multilateral index methods seem to be the best choice due to the dynamic character of scanner data. These indices work on a wholetime window and are transitive, which is key to the elimination of the chain drift effect. Following what is called an identity test, however, it may be expected that even when only prices return to their original values, the index becomes one. Unfortunately, the commonly used multilateral indices (GEKS, CCDI, GK, TPD, TDH) do not meet the identity test. The paper discusses the proposal of two multilateral indices and their weighted versions. On the one hand, the design of the proposed indices is based on the idea of the GEKS index. On the other hand, similarly to the Geary-Khamis method, it requires quality adjusting. It is shown that the proposed indices meet the identity test and most other tests. In an empirical and simulation study, these indices are compared with the SPQ index, which is relatively new and also meets the identity test. The analytical considerations as well as empirical studies confirm the high usefulness of the proposed indices.
质量调整的geks类型指数,用于基于扫描仪数据的价格比较
各种各样的零售商(超市、家用电子产品、互联网商店等)提供包含条形码级别信息的扫描仪数据,例如全球贸易商品编号(GTIN)。由于扫描仪数据提供了完整的交易信息,我们可以使用项目的支出份额作为权重,在数据聚合的最低(基本)级别计算价格指数。这里的挑战是指数公式的选择,它应该能够减少链漂移偏差和取代偏差。由于扫描仪数据的动态特性,多边索引方法似乎是最佳选择。这些指数在整个时间窗口上工作,并且是可传递的,这是消除链漂移效应的关键。然而,在所谓的身份测试之后,可以预期,即使只有价格恢复到其原始值,该指数也会成为一个。不幸的是,常用的多边指数(GEKS、CCDI、GK、TPD、TDH)不符合同一性测试。本文讨论了两个多边指数的建议及其加权版本。一方面,所提出的指数的设计是基于GEKS指数的思想。另一方面,与Geary-Khamis方法类似,它需要进行质量调整。结果表明,所提出的指标满足同一性检验和大多数其他检验。在一项实证和模拟研究中,将这些指数与SPQ指数进行了比较,SPQ指数相对较新,也符合同一性检验。分析考虑和实证研究证实了拟议指数的高度有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Transition
Statistics in Transition Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistics in Transition (SiT) is an international journal published jointly by the Polish Statistical Association (PTS) and the Central Statistical Office of Poland (CSO/GUS), which sponsors this publication. Launched in 1993, it was issued twice a year until 2006; since then it appears - under a slightly changed title, Statistics in Transition new series - three times a year; and after 2013 as a regular quarterly journal." The journal provides a forum for exchange of ideas and experience amongst members of international community of statisticians, data producers and users, including researchers, teachers, policy makers and the general public. Its initially dominating focus on statistical issues pertinent to transition from centrally planned to a market-oriented economy has gradually been extended to embracing statistical problems related to development and modernization of the system of public (official) statistics, in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信