Uso de la perforación dinámica como un método alternativo para determinar el comportamiento mecánico de materiales refractarios

TecnoLogicas Pub Date : 2017-05-02 DOI:10.22430/22565337.694
Daniel Zuluaga-Castrillón, Juan F. Hernández-Ruiz, Fabio Vargas-Galvis, M. E. López-Gómez, Claudia C. Palacio-Espinosa
{"title":"Uso de la perforación dinámica como un método alternativo para determinar el comportamiento mecánico de materiales refractarios","authors":"Daniel Zuluaga-Castrillón, Juan F. Hernández-Ruiz, Fabio Vargas-Galvis, M. E. López-Gómez, Claudia C. Palacio-Espinosa","doi":"10.22430/22565337.694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ceramic materials hardness is usually determined by Vickers microindentation, which requires rigorous sample preparation and highly demanding analysis of traces turning this method difficult to use in industrial applications. This research is focused to correlate Vickers Hardness to drilling resistance by a hard-tipped drill-bit on alumina, alumina-zirconia-silica (AZS) and alumina-chromite refractories bricks. Alumina and AZS bricks were manufactured by electromelting process leading to obtain highly densified microstructures, while alumina-chromite bricks were manufactured by pressing and sintering which conducts to lower densification and particles cohesion within the bricks microstructure. Alumina and AZS refractories measured hardness is 1506.00 ± 99.71 HV1,5N (15.10 ± 0.90 GPa) and 1028.00 ± 95.49HV2,7N (10.30 ± 0.90 GPa) respectively, which is in contrast with the low measured hardness on alumina-chromite bricks of 54.00 ± 2.00 HV50N (0.54 ± 0.02 GPa) despite of the high hardness of alumina and chromite used as feedstock maybe due to a low cohesion between the particles. Drilling resistance results showed a well-fitted behavior regarding the measured Vickers hardness then the drilling resistance test is useful to predict the hardness of highly densified as well as of friable ceramic materials.","PeriodicalId":30469,"journal":{"name":"TecnoLogicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TecnoLogicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ceramic materials hardness is usually determined by Vickers microindentation, which requires rigorous sample preparation and highly demanding analysis of traces turning this method difficult to use in industrial applications. This research is focused to correlate Vickers Hardness to drilling resistance by a hard-tipped drill-bit on alumina, alumina-zirconia-silica (AZS) and alumina-chromite refractories bricks. Alumina and AZS bricks were manufactured by electromelting process leading to obtain highly densified microstructures, while alumina-chromite bricks were manufactured by pressing and sintering which conducts to lower densification and particles cohesion within the bricks microstructure. Alumina and AZS refractories measured hardness is 1506.00 ± 99.71 HV1,5N (15.10 ± 0.90 GPa) and 1028.00 ± 95.49HV2,7N (10.30 ± 0.90 GPa) respectively, which is in contrast with the low measured hardness on alumina-chromite bricks of 54.00 ± 2.00 HV50N (0.54 ± 0.02 GPa) despite of the high hardness of alumina and chromite used as feedstock maybe due to a low cohesion between the particles. Drilling resistance results showed a well-fitted behavior regarding the measured Vickers hardness then the drilling resistance test is useful to predict the hardness of highly densified as well as of friable ceramic materials.
使用动态钻井作为确定耐火材料力学行为的替代方法
陶瓷材料的硬度通常由维氏微压痕测定,这需要严格的样品制备和高要求的轨迹分析,这种方法难以在工业应用中使用。本文研究了硬头钻头在氧化铝、氧化铝-氧化锆-二氧化硅(AZS)和氧化铝-铬铁矿耐火砖上维氏硬度与钻削阻力的关系。氧化铝和AZS砖采用电熔法制备,获得了致密的显微组织,而铝-铬铁矿砖采用压制烧结法制备,导致了较低的致密性和砖内颗粒的粘聚性。氧化铝和AZS耐火材料测得的硬度分别为1506.00±99.71 HV1,5N(15.10±0.90 GPa)和1028.00±95.49HV2,7N(10.30±0.90 GPa),这与氧化铝-铬铁矿砖测得的硬度54.00±2.00 HV50N(0.54±0.02 GPa)形成了对比,尽管作为原料的氧化铝和铬铁矿的硬度很高,可能是由于颗粒之间的凝聚力较低。钻削阻力测试结果与测量的维氏硬度具有良好的拟合性,因此钻削阻力测试可用于预测高密度和易碎陶瓷材料的硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信