Comparison of conventional radiography and computed tomography in patients admitted to the emergency department with extremity trauma — a retrospective study

Q3 Health Professions
Burak Üstün, M. Korkut, S. Söyüncü
{"title":"Comparison of conventional radiography and computed tomography in patients admitted to the emergency department with extremity trauma — a retrospective study","authors":"Burak Üstün, M. Korkut, S. Söyüncü","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare conventional radiography (X-ray) and computed tomography (CT) on diagnosis, operation plan, and hospitalization of patients with isolated extremity trauma admitted to the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed retrospectively. Patients with trauma involving extremities presenting to a tertiary ED between January 2019 and 2020 for twelve months who underwent both extremity CT and X-ray imaging were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Kappa coefficients were calculated on the CT reports. RESULTS: A total of 1306 patients were included in the study. Extremity fractures were detected in 620 (47.6%) and 775 (59.3%) patients evaluated with X-ray, and CT scans respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the X-ray of all extremity fractures by anatomical region was evaluated. For the shoulder region compared with CT, X-ray had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 98%, PPV 98%, and NPV 96% [AUC: 0.969, 95% CI 0.935 to 1.000) in","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2023.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare conventional radiography (X-ray) and computed tomography (CT) on diagnosis, operation plan, and hospitalization of patients with isolated extremity trauma admitted to the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed retrospectively. Patients with trauma involving extremities presenting to a tertiary ED between January 2019 and 2020 for twelve months who underwent both extremity CT and X-ray imaging were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Kappa coefficients were calculated on the CT reports. RESULTS: A total of 1306 patients were included in the study. Extremity fractures were detected in 620 (47.6%) and 775 (59.3%) patients evaluated with X-ray, and CT scans respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the X-ray of all extremity fractures by anatomical region was evaluated. For the shoulder region compared with CT, X-ray had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 98%, PPV 98%, and NPV 96% [AUC: 0.969, 95% CI 0.935 to 1.000) in
急诊收治的四肢创伤患者的常规x线摄影与计算机断层摄影的比较——一项回顾性研究
引言:本研究旨在比较急诊科(ED)收治的孤立性四肢创伤患者在诊断、手术计划和住院治疗方面的常规X线片(X射线)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。材料和方法:本研究采用回顾性设计。在2019年1月至2020年12个月期间,接受了四肢CT和X射线成像的四肢创伤患者被纳入研究。根据CT报告计算敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和Kappa系数。结果:本研究共纳入1306例患者。分别在620名(47.6%)和775名(59.3%)患者的X光和CT扫描中发现了四肢骨折。根据解剖区域评价X线对四肢骨折的诊断准确性。与CT相比,肩部X射线的敏感性为95%,特异性为98%,PPV为98%,NPV为96%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信