When educators are locked down: transitioning an international faculty development program from in-person to online during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2023-08-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.19322.2
Jonathan Lio, H Barrett Fromme, Hongmei Dong, Ivy Jiang, Renslow Sherer
{"title":"When educators are locked down: transitioning an international faculty development program from in-person to online during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.","authors":"Jonathan Lio,&nbsp;H Barrett Fromme,&nbsp;Hongmei Dong,&nbsp;Ivy Jiang,&nbsp;Renslow Sherer","doi":"10.12688/mep.19322.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced international faculty development programs in medical education to forgo in-person activities and transition to online learning. We sought to examine changes in international medical educators' evaluations of our faculty development program as it transitioned due to the pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> We compared survey responses from participants in our International Medical Educators Program between 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (online). The 43-item survey addressed aspects such as program evaluation and self-assessment of curriculum development and teaching skills. We analyzed data using t-tests to compare means and chi-square test for categorical variables, and performed thematic analysis of open-ended responses. <b>Results:</b> We found that trainees in both cohorts rated the program highly with regard to overall program quality and self-assessed learning outcomes, but the 2019 group reported stronger relationships with peers and instructors. Some scores for self-assessed outcomes were lower for the 2020 class, but no statistically significant differences were found in pre- and post- training scores between the two cohorts. Four themes emerged from the feedback: positive program utility, IMEP as an example of good curriculum design, timing issues, and online learning environment challenges. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite pandemic challenges, the transition to online faculty development was favorably evaluated, with high confidence in the applicability of learned skills. Future efforts should focus on fostering community and optimizing interaction times to enhance learning experiences. The study contributes insights for global medical education communities in pandemic circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19322.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced international faculty development programs in medical education to forgo in-person activities and transition to online learning. We sought to examine changes in international medical educators' evaluations of our faculty development program as it transitioned due to the pandemic. Methods: We compared survey responses from participants in our International Medical Educators Program between 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (online). The 43-item survey addressed aspects such as program evaluation and self-assessment of curriculum development and teaching skills. We analyzed data using t-tests to compare means and chi-square test for categorical variables, and performed thematic analysis of open-ended responses. Results: We found that trainees in both cohorts rated the program highly with regard to overall program quality and self-assessed learning outcomes, but the 2019 group reported stronger relationships with peers and instructors. Some scores for self-assessed outcomes were lower for the 2020 class, but no statistically significant differences were found in pre- and post- training scores between the two cohorts. Four themes emerged from the feedback: positive program utility, IMEP as an example of good curriculum design, timing issues, and online learning environment challenges. Conclusions: Despite pandemic challenges, the transition to online faculty development was favorably evaluated, with high confidence in the applicability of learned skills. Future efforts should focus on fostering community and optimizing interaction times to enhance learning experiences. The study contributes insights for global medical education communities in pandemic circumstances.

当教育工作者被封锁时:在中国新冠肺炎大流行期间,将国际教师发展计划从住院转变为在线
导语:2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使国际医学教育教师发展项目放弃面对面的活动,转向在线学习。我们试图检查国际医学教育者对我们的教师发展计划的评估的变化,因为它是由于大流行而过渡的。方法:我们比较了2019年(面对面)和2020年(在线)国际医学教育者计划参与者的调查反馈。这项43项调查涉及项目评估、课程开发和教学技能的自我评估等方面。数据分析采用t检验比较均数,分类变量采用卡方检验,开放式回答采用主题分析。结果:我们发现,两组学员对项目的整体质量和自我评估的学习成果都给予了很高的评价,但2019年的学员报告称,他们与同龄人和导师的关系更强。2020年班的一些自我评估结果得分较低,但在两个队列之间的训练前和训练后得分没有统计学上的显著差异。从反馈中出现了四个主题:积极的课程效用,IMEP作为良好课程设计的例子,时间问题,以及在线学习环境的挑战。讨论:尽管面临流行病的挑战,但向在线教师发展的过渡得到了积极的评价,对所学技能的适用性充满信心。未来的努力应该集中在培养社区和优化互动时间,以提高学习经验。该研究为大流行环境下的全球医学教育界提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信