{"title":"Irrigation quotas influenced the characteristics of the preferential flow in cotton fields under mulched drip irrigation in Northwest China","authors":"Rui Chen, Zhenhua Wang, Tianyu Wang, Xiaodi Wu","doi":"10.17221/74/2021-swr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preferential flow is associated with potential issues of poor irrigation water-fertiliser efficiency in a cultivated field. In addition, a preliminary understanding of how irrigation quotas contribute to this prevalent phenomenon is limited. Thus, one blank control group and three different irrigation quotas were set (0, 450, 550 and 650 mm) and the dye tracing image method was applied to investigate the characteristics of the preferential flow in cotton fields under mulched drip irrigation. On the basis of the results, we found significant differences in the preferential flow degree between the four groups (P = 0.02); the mean scores of the dyed area ratio Dc and variation coefficient Cv from the soil stained profile were 29.83%, 45.77%, 37.36%, 39.40% and 0.98, 1.12, 1.28, 1.17 for the total irrigation quota 0, 450, 550 and 650 mm, respectively, indicating an increasing and then decreasing tendency for the non-uniformity as well as variation in the soil water flowing as the irrigation quota being put on. At the same time, the preferential flow ratios showed a similar trend compared with Dc as well as Cv, which were 4.64%, 13.70%, 40.03%, and 23.60% for the irrigation amounts of 0, 450, 550, and 650 mm, respectively. In general, we concluded that the degree of preferential flow with an irrigation quota of 550 mm (local irrigation practice) was highest while no irrigation led to a more uniform flow in the cotton fields with film mulched. The present study goes some way towards supplementing our understanding of preferential flow in agricultural practice.","PeriodicalId":48982,"journal":{"name":"Soil and Water Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil and Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/74/2021-swr","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Preferential flow is associated with potential issues of poor irrigation water-fertiliser efficiency in a cultivated field. In addition, a preliminary understanding of how irrigation quotas contribute to this prevalent phenomenon is limited. Thus, one blank control group and three different irrigation quotas were set (0, 450, 550 and 650 mm) and the dye tracing image method was applied to investigate the characteristics of the preferential flow in cotton fields under mulched drip irrigation. On the basis of the results, we found significant differences in the preferential flow degree between the four groups (P = 0.02); the mean scores of the dyed area ratio Dc and variation coefficient Cv from the soil stained profile were 29.83%, 45.77%, 37.36%, 39.40% and 0.98, 1.12, 1.28, 1.17 for the total irrigation quota 0, 450, 550 and 650 mm, respectively, indicating an increasing and then decreasing tendency for the non-uniformity as well as variation in the soil water flowing as the irrigation quota being put on. At the same time, the preferential flow ratios showed a similar trend compared with Dc as well as Cv, which were 4.64%, 13.70%, 40.03%, and 23.60% for the irrigation amounts of 0, 450, 550, and 650 mm, respectively. In general, we concluded that the degree of preferential flow with an irrigation quota of 550 mm (local irrigation practice) was highest while no irrigation led to a more uniform flow in the cotton fields with film mulched. The present study goes some way towards supplementing our understanding of preferential flow in agricultural practice.
期刊介绍:
An international peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences and financed by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Published since 2006.
Thematic: original papers, short communications and critical reviews from all fields of science and engineering related to soil and water and their interactions in natural and man-modified landscapes, with a particular focus on agricultural land use. The fields encompassed include, but are not limited to, the basic and applied soil science, soil hydrology, irrigation and drainage of lands, hydrology, management and revitalisation of small water streams and small water reservoirs, including fishponds, soil erosion research and control, drought and flood control, wetland restoration and protection, surface and ground water protection in therms of their quantity and quality.