Construction of an Evaluation Index System to Calculate the Effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’Practices

Q2 Environmental Science
孙崇洋, 程翠云, 段显明, 杜艳春, 葛察忠
{"title":"Construction of an Evaluation Index System to Calculate the Effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’Practices","authors":"孙崇洋, 程翠云, 段显明, 杜艳春, 葛察忠","doi":"10.13198/J.ISSN.1001-6929.2020.06.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ecological protection goal(‘Lucid Waters and Lush Mountain’,LWLM)and the economic development goal(‘Gold and Silver Mountains’,GSM)are referred to as the‘Two Mountains’in this article.The objective and scientific evaluation of the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices and the clarification of bottlenecks that may restrict the conversion of‘Two Mountains’practices are essential for promoting the advancement of these practices.Based on a clarification of the connotation of the‘Two Mountains’goals,this study establishes an index system for evaluating the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices.In addition,this article analyzes 11 cities in Zhejiang Province in terms of the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices.The results showed the following:(1)During 2008-2017,both the comprehensive development level and the‘Two Mountains’index displayed a fluctuating upward trend,and the comprehensive development level had an important impact on the‘Two Mountains’index.There were also obvious regional differences in the‘Two Mountains’index between the 11 cities.(2)The ranking of the LWLM index and the ranking of the GSM index largely developed in the opposite directions in the 11 cities.Cities such as Lishui and Quzhou ranked high in the LWLM index,but ranked low in the GSM index.(3)According to the distribution of the‘Two Mountains’index,the 11 cities in Zhejiang Province could be divided into three types:the LWLM-leading type,which was a leader in ecological protection,the GSM-leading type,which was a leader in economic development,and the synchronized type,where ecological protection and economic development advanced simultaneously.This study showed that,although Zhejiang Province has entered the third phase of the‘Two Mountains’construction,there are still a large differences between the 11 cities in terms of‘Two Mountains’construction.It also showed that regional development is uneven.Cities should adapt to their local conditions,make timely adjustments in their policies,and promote‘Two Mountains’practices.","PeriodicalId":21108,"journal":{"name":"环境科学研究","volume":"33 1","pages":"2202-2209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学研究","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13198/J.ISSN.1001-6929.2020.06.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecological protection goal(‘Lucid Waters and Lush Mountain’,LWLM)and the economic development goal(‘Gold and Silver Mountains’,GSM)are referred to as the‘Two Mountains’in this article.The objective and scientific evaluation of the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices and the clarification of bottlenecks that may restrict the conversion of‘Two Mountains’practices are essential for promoting the advancement of these practices.Based on a clarification of the connotation of the‘Two Mountains’goals,this study establishes an index system for evaluating the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices.In addition,this article analyzes 11 cities in Zhejiang Province in terms of the effectiveness of‘Two Mountains’practices.The results showed the following:(1)During 2008-2017,both the comprehensive development level and the‘Two Mountains’index displayed a fluctuating upward trend,and the comprehensive development level had an important impact on the‘Two Mountains’index.There were also obvious regional differences in the‘Two Mountains’index between the 11 cities.(2)The ranking of the LWLM index and the ranking of the GSM index largely developed in the opposite directions in the 11 cities.Cities such as Lishui and Quzhou ranked high in the LWLM index,but ranked low in the GSM index.(3)According to the distribution of the‘Two Mountains’index,the 11 cities in Zhejiang Province could be divided into three types:the LWLM-leading type,which was a leader in ecological protection,the GSM-leading type,which was a leader in economic development,and the synchronized type,where ecological protection and economic development advanced simultaneously.This study showed that,although Zhejiang Province has entered the third phase of the‘Two Mountains’construction,there are still a large differences between the 11 cities in terms of‘Two Mountains’construction.It also showed that regional development is uneven.Cities should adapt to their local conditions,make timely adjustments in their policies,and promote‘Two Mountains’practices.
“两山”实践效果评价指标体系的构建
生态保护目标(“绿水青山”,LWLM)和经济发展目标(“金山银山”,GSM)在本文中被称为“两座山”。客观、科学地评价“两山”实践的有效性,澄清可能制约“两山实践”转化的瓶颈,对于促进“两山做法”的发展至关重要。在明确“两山”目标内涵的基础上,建立了“两山实践”效果评价指标体系。此外,本文还对浙江省11个城市“两山”实践的有效性进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1)2008-2017年,我国综合发展水平和“两山”指数均呈波动上升趋势,综合发展水平对“两山指数”有重要影响。11个城市的“两山”指数也存在明显的地区差异。(2) LWLM指数的排名和GSM指数的排名在11个城市中基本上朝着相反的方向发展。丽水和衢州等城市在LWLM指数中排名较高,但在GSM指数中排名较低。(3) 根据“两山”指数的分布,浙江省11个城市可分为三种类型:LWLM主导型,生态保护领先型,GSM主导型,经济发展领先型,以及生态保护与经济发展同步推进型。研究表明,尽管浙江省已进入“两山”建设的第三阶段,但11个城市在“两山建设”方面仍存在较大差距。它还表明,区域发展是不均衡的。城市要因地制宜,及时调整政策,推进“两山”实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学研究
环境科学研究 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6496
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信