Book Review: Shaping public opinion: how real advocacy journalism™ should be practiced by Ellis J.S.

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Sima Bhowmik
{"title":"Book Review: Shaping public opinion: how real advocacy journalism™ should be practiced by Ellis J.S.","authors":"Sima Bhowmik","doi":"10.1177/19312431221090682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In professional role conception, journalists are depicted as ‘watchdogs’ or ‘advocates’ (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009). Both concepts suggest that journalists should work for the public, provide information in a way which helps them to create effective public opinion important for democratic decision-making (Tsfati et al., 2006). Some scholars also argue that the practice of socially responsible journalism is helping shape more transparent public opinion (Kempf, 2007). Janice S. Ellis (2021) refers to these practices as ‘real advocacy journalism.’According to her, Real Advocacy JournalismTM is a form of public discourse free of propaganda, not for the interest of any vested quarter, but for the benefit of the people. She suggests journalists should strive to create this type of effective public opinion in politics, economics, social, and other matters. In her 2021 book titled, “Shaping Public Opinion: How Real Advocacy JournalismTM Should be Practiced,” Ellis explains how to apply the concept of ‘real advocacy journalism’ in the profession. In most parts of the book, the author draws the examples from the works of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Walter Lippmann, whose articles, columns, and books had great influence, not only in the United States but also around the world during the 20th century. In Chapter 1 the author introduces journalist, writer and columnist Walter Lippman, his role as a guardian of public interest, and his moral obligation ‘to elucidate what is good’. Ellis asserts that reasoned discourse had always been at the core of Lippmann’s writings as he had taken over the responsibility of sharing the burden of the average person and always considered what was best for them. Lippmann was a political and social theorist who advocated practicing liberal democracy in his numerous books, articles and columns. Lippmann’s columns were syndicated in more than 250 newspapers across the United States and in 25 countries around the world. Ellis claimed that Lippman, through his columns in the New York Herald Tribune from Book Review","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"16 1","pages":"249 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221090682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In professional role conception, journalists are depicted as ‘watchdogs’ or ‘advocates’ (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009). Both concepts suggest that journalists should work for the public, provide information in a way which helps them to create effective public opinion important for democratic decision-making (Tsfati et al., 2006). Some scholars also argue that the practice of socially responsible journalism is helping shape more transparent public opinion (Kempf, 2007). Janice S. Ellis (2021) refers to these practices as ‘real advocacy journalism.’According to her, Real Advocacy JournalismTM is a form of public discourse free of propaganda, not for the interest of any vested quarter, but for the benefit of the people. She suggests journalists should strive to create this type of effective public opinion in politics, economics, social, and other matters. In her 2021 book titled, “Shaping Public Opinion: How Real Advocacy JournalismTM Should be Practiced,” Ellis explains how to apply the concept of ‘real advocacy journalism’ in the profession. In most parts of the book, the author draws the examples from the works of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Walter Lippmann, whose articles, columns, and books had great influence, not only in the United States but also around the world during the 20th century. In Chapter 1 the author introduces journalist, writer and columnist Walter Lippman, his role as a guardian of public interest, and his moral obligation ‘to elucidate what is good’. Ellis asserts that reasoned discourse had always been at the core of Lippmann’s writings as he had taken over the responsibility of sharing the burden of the average person and always considered what was best for them. Lippmann was a political and social theorist who advocated practicing liberal democracy in his numerous books, articles and columns. Lippmann’s columns were syndicated in more than 250 newspapers across the United States and in 25 countries around the world. Ellis claimed that Lippman, through his columns in the New York Herald Tribune from Book Review
书评:塑造公众舆论:如何真正倡导新闻™ 应该由Ellis J.S.练习。
在职业角色概念中,记者被描述为“看门狗”或“倡导者”(Shoemaker&Vos,2009)。这两个概念都表明,记者应该为公众工作,以帮助他们创造对民主决策重要的有效舆论的方式提供信息(Tsfati等人,2006年)。一些学者还认为,对社会负责的新闻实践有助于形成更透明的公众舆论(Kempf,2007)。Janice S.Ellis(2021)将这些做法称为“真正的倡导新闻”据她说,真正的倡导新闻TM是一种没有宣传的公共话语形式,不是为了任何既得利益,而是为了人民的利益。她建议记者应该努力在政治、经济、社会和其他事务中创造这种有效的舆论。埃利斯在2021年出版的《塑造公众舆论:真正的倡导新闻TM应该如何实践》一书中解释了如何在职业中应用“真正的倡导性新闻”的概念。在本书的大部分内容中,作者引用了普利策奖获奖记者沃尔特·利普曼的作品,他的文章、专栏和书籍在20世纪不仅在美国,而且在世界各地都产生了巨大的影响。在第一章中,作者介绍了记者、作家和专栏作家Walter Lippman,他作为公共利益守护者的角色,以及他“阐明什么是好的”的道德义务。埃利斯断言,理性话语一直是李普曼作品的核心,因为他承担了分担普通人负担的责任,并总是考虑什么对他们最好。李普曼是一位政治和社会理论家,他在众多的书籍、文章和专栏中倡导实践自由民主。李普曼的专栏在美国和世界25个国家的250多家报纸上联合发表。埃利斯在《纽约先驱论坛报》的书评专栏中声称,李普曼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信