The Covid-19 pandemic and socio-economic protection for refugees in South Africa

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
C. Kavuro
{"title":"The Covid-19 pandemic and socio-economic protection for refugees in South Africa","authors":"C. Kavuro","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2034525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the protection of the socio-economic rights and benefits in view of the relief measures taken to alleviate the economic distress caused by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Similar to South African counterparts, refugees and asylum seekers looked up to the South African government for their protection (known as ‘the surrogate national protection’) because they could not turn to their home governments from which they fled for national protection. It considers the divergence between the principles of refugee protection and citizenship, to underline that the South African government has the responsibility to protect refugees and asylum seekers. Drawing upon these principles, the paper analyses the Covid-19 relief packages from the perspectives of the spirits, purport, and objects of the Refugees Act 130 of 1998. In particular, it critically illustrates the conflicted and ambivalent attitudes of the South African government towards the implementation of surrogate national protection in real and actual situations.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"466 - 491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2034525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the protection of the socio-economic rights and benefits in view of the relief measures taken to alleviate the economic distress caused by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Similar to South African counterparts, refugees and asylum seekers looked up to the South African government for their protection (known as ‘the surrogate national protection’) because they could not turn to their home governments from which they fled for national protection. It considers the divergence between the principles of refugee protection and citizenship, to underline that the South African government has the responsibility to protect refugees and asylum seekers. Drawing upon these principles, the paper analyses the Covid-19 relief packages from the perspectives of the spirits, purport, and objects of the Refugees Act 130 of 1998. In particular, it critically illustrates the conflicted and ambivalent attitudes of the South African government towards the implementation of surrogate national protection in real and actual situations.
新冠肺炎大流行和对南非难民的社会经济保护
摘要本文从为缓解新冠肺炎疫情造成的经济困境而采取的救济措施的角度,审视了对社会经济权利和利益的保护。与南非同行类似,难民和寻求庇护者向南非政府寻求保护(被称为“替代国家保护”),因为他们无法向逃离的本国政府寻求国家保护。它考虑了难民保护和公民身份原则之间的分歧,以强调南非政府有责任保护难民和寻求庇护者。根据这些原则,本文从1998年第130号《难民法》的精神、主旨和目标的角度分析了新冠肺炎救济方案。特别是,它批判性地说明了南非政府在现实和实际情况下对实施替代国家保护的矛盾和矛盾态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信