Pengaruh Pemadatan Dua-arah Penekanan Terhadap Densitas dan Kekerasan AMC diperkuat Serbuk Silikon Dioksida

Ricky Irwansyah, Rodika Rodika, Agus Wanto, Mego Wahyudi, Sukanto Wiryono
{"title":"Pengaruh Pemadatan Dua-arah Penekanan Terhadap Densitas dan Kekerasan AMC diperkuat Serbuk Silikon Dioksida","authors":"Ricky Irwansyah, Rodika Rodika, Agus Wanto, Mego Wahyudi, Sukanto Wiryono","doi":"10.35970/infotekmesin.v14i2.1902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The compaction method of powder metallurgy technology is an important process in influencing the density and hardness of the resulting product. This study aims to determine the effect of a one-way compaction method compared to a two-way compaction method on the density and hardness of the resulting composite product. The experimental method for making aluminum matrix composites with silica sand reinforcement applies a compaction pressure of 4500 Psi. Mixing utilizing mechanical alloying used a horizontal ball mill machine. The density test refers to the Archimedes principle with the ASTM B962-17 standard, while the Rockwell Brinel hardness test uses the ASTM E110-14 standard. The results of the sample density test of the two-way compaction method of compaction showed a higher value compared to the sample density of the one-way compaction results, respectively; values of 2.132 g/cm3 and 2.119 g/cm3. The hardness value of the sample resulting from two-way compression compaction also has a higher value than the sample hardness resulting from one-way compression compaction, respectively; worth 43.67 HRB and 36.78 HRB. Furthermore, based on the results of microstructural analysis, the interlocking bonding occurs in composite samples with two-way compaction. It is also better than the interlocking mechanical bonding in composite samples resulting from one-way compaction.","PeriodicalId":33598,"journal":{"name":"Infotekmesin Media Komunikasi Ilmiah Politeknik Cilacap","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infotekmesin Media Komunikasi Ilmiah Politeknik Cilacap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35970/infotekmesin.v14i2.1902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The compaction method of powder metallurgy technology is an important process in influencing the density and hardness of the resulting product. This study aims to determine the effect of a one-way compaction method compared to a two-way compaction method on the density and hardness of the resulting composite product. The experimental method for making aluminum matrix composites with silica sand reinforcement applies a compaction pressure of 4500 Psi. Mixing utilizing mechanical alloying used a horizontal ball mill machine. The density test refers to the Archimedes principle with the ASTM B962-17 standard, while the Rockwell Brinel hardness test uses the ASTM E110-14 standard. The results of the sample density test of the two-way compaction method of compaction showed a higher value compared to the sample density of the one-way compaction results, respectively; values of 2.132 g/cm3 and 2.119 g/cm3. The hardness value of the sample resulting from two-way compression compaction also has a higher value than the sample hardness resulting from one-way compression compaction, respectively; worth 43.67 HRB and 36.78 HRB. Furthermore, based on the results of microstructural analysis, the interlocking bonding occurs in composite samples with two-way compaction. It is also better than the interlocking mechanical bonding in composite samples resulting from one-way compaction.
二路固化强调密度和硬度的影响会增强二氧化硅尘
粉末冶金工艺的压实方法是影响产品密度和硬度的重要过程。本研究旨在确定单向压实法与双向压实法对复合材料产品密度和硬度的影响。用硅砂增强制备铝基复合材料的实验方法施加4500psi的压实压力。采用卧式球磨机进行机械合金化混合。密度试验采用ASTM B962-17标准的阿基米德原理,而洛氏-布氏硬度试验采用ASTM E110-14标准。双向压实法的样品密度测试结果分别显示出比单向压实法的样本密度更高的值;值分别为2.132g/cm3和2.119g/cm3。双向压缩压实产生的样品的硬度值也分别高于单向压缩压实形成的样品硬度值;价值43.67 HRB和36.78 HRB。此外,基于微观结构分析的结果,双向压实的复合材料样品中发生了互锁结合。它也比单向压实产生的复合材料样品中的联锁机械结合更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信