Restriction analysis: an applied view in a public educational institution of the Rio Grande do Sul

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Lavinia Lopes de Mello, Débora Desconsi Sutero, Luis Carlos Alves da Silva, Maicon da Silva, Fernando Batista Bandeira da Fontoura
{"title":"Restriction analysis: an applied view in a public educational institution of the Rio Grande do Sul","authors":"Lavinia Lopes de Mello, Débora Desconsi Sutero, Luis Carlos Alves da Silva, Maicon da Silva, Fernando Batista Bandeira da Fontoura","doi":"10.14807/IJMP.V12I4.1396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the applicability of the five steps of the theory of restrictions as an alternative for improving the efficiency of processes in a public organization. Methodologically the study is characterized as descriptive and exploratory, with bibliographic research and data analysis being performed qualitatively. The research was carried out in loco, through the observation technique. As main results of the research, the feasibility and importance of the application of the tool is ratified, directly impacting on efficiency and quality maximization in the services offered to society and optimizing public resources, which can be applied in other sectors of our society. With the efficiency in achieving the applicability of the five steps of the theory of restrictions, the management and identification of the bottleneck in the process of cooperation agreements contributed to speed up public service. The research becomes relevant since it encourages the application of the theory of restrictions in public entities, being a tool for identifying restrictions in processes, providing greater","PeriodicalId":54124,"journal":{"name":"Independent Journal of Management & Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Independent Journal of Management & Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14807/IJMP.V12I4.1396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the applicability of the five steps of the theory of restrictions as an alternative for improving the efficiency of processes in a public organization. Methodologically the study is characterized as descriptive and exploratory, with bibliographic research and data analysis being performed qualitatively. The research was carried out in loco, through the observation technique. As main results of the research, the feasibility and importance of the application of the tool is ratified, directly impacting on efficiency and quality maximization in the services offered to society and optimizing public resources, which can be applied in other sectors of our society. With the efficiency in achieving the applicability of the five steps of the theory of restrictions, the management and identification of the bottleneck in the process of cooperation agreements contributed to speed up public service. The research becomes relevant since it encourages the application of the theory of restrictions in public entities, being a tool for identifying restrictions in processes, providing greater
制约分析:南里奥格兰德州一所公立教育机构的应用视角
本研究旨在分析限制理论的五个步骤作为提高公共组织流程效率的替代方案的适用性。从方法论上讲,该研究具有描述性和探索性的特点,并进行了定性的文献研究和数据分析。这项研究是通过观察技术在现场进行的。作为研究的主要结果,该工具的应用的可行性和重要性得到了认可,直接影响到为社会提供服务的效率和质量最大化,以及优化公共资源,可以应用于我们社会的其他部门。随着限制理论五个步骤的有效实现,合作协议过程中瓶颈的管理和识别有助于加快公共服务。这项研究之所以具有相关性,是因为它鼓励在公共实体中应用限制理论,作为识别过程中限制的工具,提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
105
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信