Common Challenges Postgraduate Students and Early-Career Academics face when Engaging with the Scholarly Literature

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
B. Daniel
{"title":"Common Challenges Postgraduate Students and Early-Career Academics face when Engaging with the Scholarly Literature","authors":"B. Daniel","doi":"10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents nine common challenges postgraduate students and early career academics face when engaging with academic literature. Data was collected from a sample of sixty-two postgraduate and early career academics who participated in a series of workshops on research methodology at a research-intensive university in New Zealand. Participants were invited to answer open-ended questions online about the purpose of undertaking a literature review and the challenges associated with the process. Findings revealed that participants held fragmented views about the purpose of engaging with the literature review, which contributed to the difficulties they faced in effectively undertaking the literature review. The challenges participants reported when undertaking literature reviews: difficulties in choosing a practical approach to reviewing the literature, inability to design an efficient search strategy to locate materials for review, problems locating relevant literature, an inability to determine the appropriate scope of a review, issues in choosing relevant materials and managing the growing volume of published work, problems in effectively synthesising and critiquing the literature, inability to organise and write clear reports, and lack of indicators for assessing the quality of written literature reports. The research presents a wide range of strategies students, and early career academics can use to mitigate these challenges. Teachers of research methods can also use these strategies to support students develop the necessary skills and knowledge to tackle the challenges of engaging with the literature.","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents nine common challenges postgraduate students and early career academics face when engaging with academic literature. Data was collected from a sample of sixty-two postgraduate and early career academics who participated in a series of workshops on research methodology at a research-intensive university in New Zealand. Participants were invited to answer open-ended questions online about the purpose of undertaking a literature review and the challenges associated with the process. Findings revealed that participants held fragmented views about the purpose of engaging with the literature review, which contributed to the difficulties they faced in effectively undertaking the literature review. The challenges participants reported when undertaking literature reviews: difficulties in choosing a practical approach to reviewing the literature, inability to design an efficient search strategy to locate materials for review, problems locating relevant literature, an inability to determine the appropriate scope of a review, issues in choosing relevant materials and managing the growing volume of published work, problems in effectively synthesising and critiquing the literature, inability to organise and write clear reports, and lack of indicators for assessing the quality of written literature reports. The research presents a wide range of strategies students, and early career academics can use to mitigate these challenges. Teachers of research methods can also use these strategies to support students develop the necessary skills and knowledge to tackle the challenges of engaging with the literature.
研究生和早期职业学者在接触学术文献时面临的共同挑战
本文介绍了研究生和早期学者在从事学术文献工作时面临的九个常见挑战。数据是从62名研究生和早期职业学者的样本中收集的,他们参加了新西兰一所研究密集型大学的一系列研究方法研讨会。与会者被邀请在线回答关于进行文献综述的目的和与该过程相关的挑战的开放式问题。调查结果显示,参与者对参与文献综述的目的持有零散的看法,这导致了他们在有效进行文献综述时面临的困难。参与者在进行文献综述时报告的挑战:难以选择实用的文献综述方法,无法设计有效的搜索策略来定位待综述的材料,查找相关文献的问题,无法确定综述的适当范围,选择相关材料和管理不断增长的出版作品的问题,有效综合和批评文献的问题,无法组织和撰写清晰的报告,以及缺乏评估书面文献报告质量的指标。这项研究提出了学生和早期职业学者可以用来缓解这些挑战的广泛策略。研究方法的教师也可以使用这些策略来支持学生发展必要的技能和知识,以应对接触文献的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信