Cost-Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abhisheik Prashar, K. Mitchell, A. Hopkins, M. Sader, A. Prasan
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"Abhisheik Prashar, K. Mitchell, A. Hopkins, M. Sader, A. Prasan","doi":"10.3390/hearts2040043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We sought to investigate the rates of same-day discharge (SDD) post elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at our institution and review its safety by examining clinical outcomes. We also performed an economic analysis evaluating our hospital’s cost data for SDD following PCI. Methods: Patients undergoing elective PCI at St George Hospital, Australia, from January 2017 to December 2019 were evaluated. Primary outcomes included 7-day major adverse cardiovascular endpoints (MACEs) and readmission to hospital within 30 days. Results: Among 502 patients who underwent elective PCI, 421 patients (83.8%) were managed with SDD. There was one case of acute stent thrombosis and one case of coronary wire-induced perforation requiring a pericardial drain that occurred following elective PCI with SDD (0.54%). Unplanned cardiac re-hospitalisation at 30 days following elective PCI was 5.2%. SDD after elective PCI was associated with a healthcare cost saving of AUD 4817 per case. Conclusion: SDD following elective PCI was demonstrated to be a safe and effective strategy that was also associated with significant cost savings. SDD following elective PCI warrants more widespread use as it lowers healthcare costs, has equivalent patient outcomes and improves patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":93563,"journal":{"name":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hearts2040043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to investigate the rates of same-day discharge (SDD) post elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at our institution and review its safety by examining clinical outcomes. We also performed an economic analysis evaluating our hospital’s cost data for SDD following PCI. Methods: Patients undergoing elective PCI at St George Hospital, Australia, from January 2017 to December 2019 were evaluated. Primary outcomes included 7-day major adverse cardiovascular endpoints (MACEs) and readmission to hospital within 30 days. Results: Among 502 patients who underwent elective PCI, 421 patients (83.8%) were managed with SDD. There was one case of acute stent thrombosis and one case of coronary wire-induced perforation requiring a pericardial drain that occurred following elective PCI with SDD (0.54%). Unplanned cardiac re-hospitalisation at 30 days following elective PCI was 5.2%. SDD after elective PCI was associated with a healthcare cost saving of AUD 4817 per case. Conclusion: SDD following elective PCI was demonstrated to be a safe and effective strategy that was also associated with significant cost savings. SDD following elective PCI warrants more widespread use as it lowers healthcare costs, has equivalent patient outcomes and improves patient satisfaction.
选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当天出院的成本效益和安全性
目的:我们试图调查我们机构选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的当天出院率,并通过检查临床结果来审查其安全性。我们还进行了经济分析,评估了我们医院PCI后SDD的成本数据。方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月在澳大利亚圣乔治医院接受选择性PCI的患者进行评估。主要转归包括7天主要心血管不良终点(MACE)和30天内再次入院。结果:在502名接受选择性PCI的患者中,421名患者(83.8%)接受了SDD治疗。在选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(SDD)后,发生了1例急性支架血栓形成和1例需要心包引流的冠状动脉导线诱导穿孔(0.54%)。选择性经皮介入治疗后30天的非计划心脏再住院率为5.2%。选择性经皮内介入治疗后的SDD可为每例患者节省4817澳元的医疗费用。结论:选择性PCI后的SDD被证明是一种安全有效的策略,也可以显著节省成本。选择性PCI后的SDD保证了更广泛的使用,因为它降低了医疗成本,具有同等的患者结果,并提高了患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信