Evaluation of a web-based learning management platform and formative assessment tools for a Medical Parasitology undergraduate course

Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.21608/puj.2020.29543.1070
R. Wassef, F. Elkhamisy
{"title":"Evaluation of a web-based learning management platform and formative assessment tools for a Medical Parasitology undergraduate course","authors":"R. Wassef, F. Elkhamisy","doi":"10.21608/puj.2020.29543.1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical education for undergraduate students in preclinical sciences is challenging and often described as boring by students. Educators have to find interesting new methods to deliver information and increase students' engagement and performance. The incorporation of new technological tools can help in this regard.  \nObjectives: This retrospective study investigated two technological tools: Google Classroom learning management platform and Google Quiz Forms for online assessment, as regards students' satisfaction, engagement, and performance. \nDesign and Methodology: The same Parasitology course has been taught in a classic face-to-face way during the first year of the study and taught by blended learning technique over the second year. The performance of the students of each year was compared and a questionnaire was introduced at the end of the second year to assess the students' satisfaction. \nResults: Students who took full advantage of these tools showed improvement of their performance (Mean= 79 in the assessment versus 83.6 in their final exam (P=0.01) and achieved significantly better scores than those of year-1 and year-2 in the final exam (Mean= 83.6 versus 76.3 and 72.7 respectively, P<0.001).  Among 128 questionnaire responders, 78.9% preferred the e-learning, 94.5% found the Google Classroom easy to use, 76.6% described it as a time saver for submission of assignments and 96.9% expressed their wish to continue to use the blended learning as well as the formative assessments in other courses and would recommend it to others. They all agreed that the formative assessments at the end of each lecture helped them in summarizing the delivered topic and consolidated the received information. \nConclusions: Use of these mobile-friendly, freely available technological tools in resource-limited higher education institutions is recommended to improve the students' engagement and performance in the preclinical sciences.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/puj.2020.29543.1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Medical education for undergraduate students in preclinical sciences is challenging and often described as boring by students. Educators have to find interesting new methods to deliver information and increase students' engagement and performance. The incorporation of new technological tools can help in this regard.  Objectives: This retrospective study investigated two technological tools: Google Classroom learning management platform and Google Quiz Forms for online assessment, as regards students' satisfaction, engagement, and performance. Design and Methodology: The same Parasitology course has been taught in a classic face-to-face way during the first year of the study and taught by blended learning technique over the second year. The performance of the students of each year was compared and a questionnaire was introduced at the end of the second year to assess the students' satisfaction. Results: Students who took full advantage of these tools showed improvement of their performance (Mean= 79 in the assessment versus 83.6 in their final exam (P=0.01) and achieved significantly better scores than those of year-1 and year-2 in the final exam (Mean= 83.6 versus 76.3 and 72.7 respectively, P<0.001).  Among 128 questionnaire responders, 78.9% preferred the e-learning, 94.5% found the Google Classroom easy to use, 76.6% described it as a time saver for submission of assignments and 96.9% expressed their wish to continue to use the blended learning as well as the formative assessments in other courses and would recommend it to others. They all agreed that the formative assessments at the end of each lecture helped them in summarizing the delivered topic and consolidated the received information. Conclusions: Use of these mobile-friendly, freely available technological tools in resource-limited higher education institutions is recommended to improve the students' engagement and performance in the preclinical sciences.
分享
查看原文
医学寄生虫学本科课程网络学习管理平台和形成性评估工具的评估
背景:临床前科学本科生的医学教育具有挑战性,学生们常常认为这很无聊。教育工作者必须找到有趣的新方法来传递信息,提高学生的参与度和表现。纳入新的技术工具可以在这方面有所帮助。目的:这项回顾性研究调查了两种技术工具:谷歌课堂学习管理平台和谷歌测验表格,用于在线评估学生的满意度、参与度和表现。设计与方法:在研究的第一年,同样的寄生虫学课程以经典的面对面方式教授,第二年则采用混合学习技术教授。比较了每一年学生的表现,并在第二年结束时引入了一份问卷来评估学生的满意度。结果:充分利用这些工具的学生表现出了成绩的改善(评估中的平均值为79,期末考试为83.6(P=0.01),期末考试成绩明显好于一年级和二年级的学生(平均值分别为83.6,76.3和72.7,P<0.001),94.5%的人认为谷歌课堂很容易使用,76.6%的人认为它可以节省提交作业的时间,96.9%的人表示希望在其他课程中继续使用混合学习和形成性评估,并将其推荐给其他人。他们一致认为,每次讲座结束时的形成性评估有助于他们总结所讲的主题,并巩固所收到的信息。结论:建议在资源有限的高等教育机构中使用这些移动友好、免费提供的技术工具,以提高学生在临床前科学方面的参与度和表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信