Literacy Instruction for Secondary Students With Disabilities

K. Malmgren, Beverly J. Trezek
{"title":"Literacy Instruction for Secondary Students With Disabilities","authors":"K. Malmgren, Beverly J. Trezek","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V41I6.6838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the professional literature and discourse has continually reinforced the importance of building and strengthening the reading skills of young children, it has long overlooked the importance of literacy instruction at the secondary level, particularly for adolescents who still struggle with reading. Recent initiatives aimed at improving the reading skills of the nation's youth (e.g., Reading First, No Child Left Behind) have resulted in improvements in skills across learners in the early grades; however, the same improvements have not been realized for adolescents. According to the recent National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), there was no significant change in the percentage of readers considered proficient in eighth grade from 1992-2007, whereas the percentage of proficient readers in fourth grade rose significantly over the same period of time (Lee, Grigg, & Donahue, 2007). Compounding the problem, remedial support for literacy is typically provided only at the elementary school level. Consequently, students who enter secondary school still struggling with reading tend to continue to struggle throughout their middle and high school years (Deshler, Palincsar, Biancarosa, & Nair, 2007; Hasselbring & Goin, 2004). In a recent meta-analytic review of interventions for adolescent struggling readers, Scammacca et al. (2007) offered several implications for practice. First, and perhaps most important, the authors indicated that adolescence is not too late to intervene and even older students with learning disabilities benefit from targeted interventions at both the word and text level. Specifically, interventions that focus on word study, developing word meanings and concepts as well as comprehension strategies are appropriate and beneficial for adolescent struggling readers. Adolescents who struggle to read have unique needs. Recent research suggests components of effective reading instruction as defined by the National Reading Panel (NRP) which we have situated within Chall's (1996) interactive model of reading development. We summarize Chall's model and the components of effective reading instruction detailed in the NRP, followed by a summary of several effective interventions focused on the development of these components at the secondary (i.e., middle and high school) level. Additionally, we provide readers with information about additional resources for improving literacy instruction for struggling secondary readers.","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/FOEC.V41I6.6838","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V41I6.6838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While the professional literature and discourse has continually reinforced the importance of building and strengthening the reading skills of young children, it has long overlooked the importance of literacy instruction at the secondary level, particularly for adolescents who still struggle with reading. Recent initiatives aimed at improving the reading skills of the nation's youth (e.g., Reading First, No Child Left Behind) have resulted in improvements in skills across learners in the early grades; however, the same improvements have not been realized for adolescents. According to the recent National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), there was no significant change in the percentage of readers considered proficient in eighth grade from 1992-2007, whereas the percentage of proficient readers in fourth grade rose significantly over the same period of time (Lee, Grigg, & Donahue, 2007). Compounding the problem, remedial support for literacy is typically provided only at the elementary school level. Consequently, students who enter secondary school still struggling with reading tend to continue to struggle throughout their middle and high school years (Deshler, Palincsar, Biancarosa, & Nair, 2007; Hasselbring & Goin, 2004). In a recent meta-analytic review of interventions for adolescent struggling readers, Scammacca et al. (2007) offered several implications for practice. First, and perhaps most important, the authors indicated that adolescence is not too late to intervene and even older students with learning disabilities benefit from targeted interventions at both the word and text level. Specifically, interventions that focus on word study, developing word meanings and concepts as well as comprehension strategies are appropriate and beneficial for adolescent struggling readers. Adolescents who struggle to read have unique needs. Recent research suggests components of effective reading instruction as defined by the National Reading Panel (NRP) which we have situated within Chall's (1996) interactive model of reading development. We summarize Chall's model and the components of effective reading instruction detailed in the NRP, followed by a summary of several effective interventions focused on the development of these components at the secondary (i.e., middle and high school) level. Additionally, we provide readers with information about additional resources for improving literacy instruction for struggling secondary readers.
中学残疾学生识字教育
尽管专业文献和论述不断强调培养和加强幼儿阅读技能的重要性,但长期以来,它忽视了中学识字教学的重要性,尤其是对仍在努力阅读的青少年而言。最近旨在提高国家青年阅读技能的举措(例如,“阅读优先”、“不让一个孩子掉队”)提高了早期学习者的阅读技能;然而,对于青少年来说,并没有实现同样的改善。根据最近的国家教育进步评估(NAEP),自1992-2007年以来,被认为精通八年级的读者比例没有显著变化,而在同一时期,精通四年级读者的比例显著上升(Lee,Grigg,&Donahue,2007)。使问题更加复杂的是,扫盲的补救支持通常只在小学一级提供。因此,进入中学仍在阅读方面挣扎的学生往往会在整个中学和高中阶段继续挣扎(Deshler,Palincsar,Biancarosa,&Nair,2007;Hasselbring和Goin,2004年)。Scammacca等人(2007)在最近对青少年读者干预措施的元分析综述中提出了一些对实践的启示。首先,也许也是最重要的一点,作者指出,青春期进行干预还为时不晚,甚至有学习障碍的年长学生也能从单词和文本层面的有针对性的干预中受益。具体而言,侧重于单词研究、发展单词含义和概念以及理解策略的干预措施对陷入困境的青少年读者来说是合适和有益的。难以阅读的青少年有着独特的需求。最近的研究表明,国家阅读小组(NRP)定义了有效阅读教学的组成部分,我们将其置于Chall(1996)的阅读发展互动模型中。我们总结了Chall的模型和NRP中详细介绍的有效阅读教学的组成部分,然后总结了几项有效的干预措施,重点是在中学(即中学和高中)层面发展这些组成部分。此外,我们还为读者提供有关额外资源的信息,以改善陷入困境的二级读者的识字教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信