The Broader Context of Sympathy in Book 2 of the Treatise

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.1353/hms.2020.0001
Hynek Janoušek
{"title":"The Broader Context of Sympathy in Book 2 of the Treatise","authors":"Hynek Janoušek","doi":"10.1353/hms.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The following text suggests interpreting Hume's theory of sympathy in Book 2 of the Treatise of Human Nature in a broader context of relations, feelings, and sentiments. It is this context which marks off different types of impressions and their different phenomenology, and offers rich insights into Hume's theory. As regards Hume's theory of sympathy, it can be analyzed for various cases of sympathy both in the context of the (1) conception involved in a given case of sympathy, and in the context of its (2) doxastic and (3) affect-constituting vivacity. The article first describes three kinds of associative relations (causal relations, relations of modes and substances, and projection of spatial contiguity) involved in the conception of passions in sympathy, and shows how these relations might help to differentiate impressions of our feelings from those of other people. Yet another distinction between impressions produced by sympathy is possible with respect to the context of belief or doxastic vivacity involved in the conception of the feelings of others. The text tries to illustrate this by showing how the neutralization of disbelief and relations of space and time differentiate impressions of sympathy with fictive heroes of tragic plays, from sympathy with real people in everyday life. Finally, the article discusses a broader context of the affect-constituting vivacity. Even though Hume's view of the origin of this vivacity remains unclear, it can be shown that the affect-constituting vivacity grounds our proper experience with others as affective others, and differentiates our conception of persons from our conception of inanimate objects. Moreover, different kinds of associative relations involved in the transfer of the affect-constituting liveliness differentiate felt emotions of people which are close to us from felt emotions of people related to us merely on account of our self-interest.1","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"33 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hume Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2020.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The following text suggests interpreting Hume's theory of sympathy in Book 2 of the Treatise of Human Nature in a broader context of relations, feelings, and sentiments. It is this context which marks off different types of impressions and their different phenomenology, and offers rich insights into Hume's theory. As regards Hume's theory of sympathy, it can be analyzed for various cases of sympathy both in the context of the (1) conception involved in a given case of sympathy, and in the context of its (2) doxastic and (3) affect-constituting vivacity. The article first describes three kinds of associative relations (causal relations, relations of modes and substances, and projection of spatial contiguity) involved in the conception of passions in sympathy, and shows how these relations might help to differentiate impressions of our feelings from those of other people. Yet another distinction between impressions produced by sympathy is possible with respect to the context of belief or doxastic vivacity involved in the conception of the feelings of others. The text tries to illustrate this by showing how the neutralization of disbelief and relations of space and time differentiate impressions of sympathy with fictive heroes of tragic plays, from sympathy with real people in everyday life. Finally, the article discusses a broader context of the affect-constituting vivacity. Even though Hume's view of the origin of this vivacity remains unclear, it can be shown that the affect-constituting vivacity grounds our proper experience with others as affective others, and differentiates our conception of persons from our conception of inanimate objects. Moreover, different kinds of associative relations involved in the transfer of the affect-constituting liveliness differentiate felt emotions of people which are close to us from felt emotions of people related to us merely on account of our self-interest.1
《人性论》第二卷中同情的大背景
摘要:以下文本建议从更广泛的关系、情感和情感的角度来解读《人性论》第二卷中休谟的同情理论。正是在这样的语境中,不同类型的印象及其不同的现象学,为休谟的理论提供了丰富的见解。关于休谟的同情理论,既可以从(1)同情的概念中分析同情的各种情况,也可以从(2)多愁善感和(3)构成活泼的情感中分析同情。文章首先描述了同情激情概念中涉及的三种联想关系(因果关系、模式和物质的关系以及空间邻接性的投射),并展示了这些关系如何有助于区分我们对情感的印象和其他人的印象。同情产生的印象之间的另一种区别可能是在信仰或对他人感受的概念中所涉及的乐观主义的背景下。本文试图通过展示怀疑和时空关系的中和如何区分日常生活中对悲剧剧中虚构英雄的同情和对真人的同情来说明这一点。最后,文章讨论了情感构成生命力的更广泛的语境。尽管休谟对这种活泼性起源的看法仍然不清楚,但可以表明,构成活泼性的情感奠定了我们作为情感他人对他人的适当体验的基础,并将我们对人的概念与对无生命物体的概念区分开来。此外,构成活力的情感传递所涉及的不同类型的联想关系将与我们关系密切的人的感受情绪与仅仅出于自身利益而与我们有关的人的感觉情绪区分开来。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信