{"title":"“Esther Weren’t No Harlot”: Rape and Marriage in Go Tell It on the Mountain","authors":"Porter Nenon","doi":"10.7227/JBR.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To consider how James Baldwin resisted racialized notions of sexuality in his first novel, Go Tell It on the Mountain , I employ a number of black feminist critics—including Saidiya Hartman, Patricia Williams, Hortense Spillers, and Patricia Hill Collins—to analyze three under-studied minor characters: Deborah, Esther, and Richard. Those three characters are best understood as figures of heterosexual nonconformity who articulate sophisticated and important critiques of rape and marriage in America at the turn of the twentieth century. Baldwin thus wrote subversive theories of race and sexuality into the margins of the novel, making its style inextricable from its politics. Baldwin’s use of marginal voices was a deft and intentional artistic choice that was emancipatory for his characters and that remains enduringly relevant to American sexual politics. In this particularly polarizing transition from the Obama era to the Donald J. Trump presidency, I revisit Baldwin’s ability to subtly translate political ideas across fault lines like race, nationality, and sex.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"9-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/JBR.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To consider how James Baldwin resisted racialized notions of sexuality in his first novel, Go Tell It on the Mountain , I employ a number of black feminist critics—including Saidiya Hartman, Patricia Williams, Hortense Spillers, and Patricia Hill Collins—to analyze three under-studied minor characters: Deborah, Esther, and Richard. Those three characters are best understood as figures of heterosexual nonconformity who articulate sophisticated and important critiques of rape and marriage in America at the turn of the twentieth century. Baldwin thus wrote subversive theories of race and sexuality into the margins of the novel, making its style inextricable from its politics. Baldwin’s use of marginal voices was a deft and intentional artistic choice that was emancipatory for his characters and that remains enduringly relevant to American sexual politics. In this particularly polarizing transition from the Obama era to the Donald J. Trump presidency, I revisit Baldwin’s ability to subtly translate political ideas across fault lines like race, nationality, and sex.
为了考虑詹姆斯·鲍德温在他的第一部小说《去山上告诉它》中是如何抵制种族化的性观念的,我聘请了一些黑人女权主义评论家——包括赛迪亚·哈特曼、帕特里夏·威廉姆斯、霍顿斯·斯皮勒斯和帕特里夏·希尔·柯林斯——来分析三个未被充分研究的次要角色:黛博拉、埃斯特和理查德。这三个角色被最好地理解为异性恋不一致性的人物,他们在20世纪之交的美国对强奸和婚姻提出了复杂而重要的批评。因此,鲍德温将颠覆性的种族和性理论写进了小说的边缘,使其风格与政治密不可分。鲍德温对边缘声音的使用是一种巧妙而有意的艺术选择,这对他的角色来说是一种解放,并且一直与美国的性政治有关。在这个从奥巴马时代到唐纳德·j·特朗普(Donald J. Trump)总统任期的特别两极分化的过渡时期,我重温了鲍德温跨越种族、国籍和性别等断层线微妙地解读政治思想的能力。