Corporate real estate and green building: prevalence, transparency and drivers

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
T. Richter, Eveline Soliva, M. Haase, Isabelle Wrase
{"title":"Corporate real estate and green building: prevalence, transparency and drivers","authors":"T. Richter, Eveline Soliva, M. Haase, Isabelle Wrase","doi":"10.1108/jcre-05-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nGreen building is a megatrend in corporate real estate management. This paper aims to document the prevalence of green building reporting in public firms, assess how well firms apply good practices of green building and show which firms, countries and industry sectors are particularly advanced in the application of green building technologies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses data on green building reporting, green building scores and firm characteristics of 1,281 publicly traded firms from different industries in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries over a 5-year period. Regression analysis is used to relate the adoption of green building reporting and excellence in green building to firm characteristics.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that there is a huge variation in green building activities and reporting in corporate real estate management across countries and industries. The study finds that firms in the financial and health-care sectors are leading in green building reporting. Environmental, social and corporate governance-oriented, profitable and large firms receive the highest green building scores.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe results in this paper rely on the reported but not inevitably monitored green building activities. There may also be companies that use green building technologies but do not report on them. The conclusions are largely based on correlations and do not allow for causal statements (endogenous variables).\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results in this paper are crucial for practitioners in corporate real estate to benchmark their green building activities and reporting. Additionally, the paper sheds light on how information on green building is propagated in the financial market.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper looks at the drivers and barriers of green building for 25 countries and across all industry sectors (1,281 firms). In contrast to that most of the existing literature focuses on single countries and limits the analysis to companies in the real estate and construction industry. Additionally, the paper has a joint focus on publicly available green building reporting and green building scores.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-05-2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Green building is a megatrend in corporate real estate management. This paper aims to document the prevalence of green building reporting in public firms, assess how well firms apply good practices of green building and show which firms, countries and industry sectors are particularly advanced in the application of green building technologies. Design/methodology/approach The study uses data on green building reporting, green building scores and firm characteristics of 1,281 publicly traded firms from different industries in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries over a 5-year period. Regression analysis is used to relate the adoption of green building reporting and excellence in green building to firm characteristics. Findings The results indicate that there is a huge variation in green building activities and reporting in corporate real estate management across countries and industries. The study finds that firms in the financial and health-care sectors are leading in green building reporting. Environmental, social and corporate governance-oriented, profitable and large firms receive the highest green building scores. Research limitations/implications The results in this paper rely on the reported but not inevitably monitored green building activities. There may also be companies that use green building technologies but do not report on them. The conclusions are largely based on correlations and do not allow for causal statements (endogenous variables). Practical implications The results in this paper are crucial for practitioners in corporate real estate to benchmark their green building activities and reporting. Additionally, the paper sheds light on how information on green building is propagated in the financial market. Originality/value The paper looks at the drivers and barriers of green building for 25 countries and across all industry sectors (1,281 firms). In contrast to that most of the existing literature focuses on single countries and limits the analysis to companies in the real estate and construction industry. Additionally, the paper has a joint focus on publicly available green building reporting and green building scores.
企业房地产和绿色建筑:普遍性、透明度和驱动因素
绿色建筑是企业物业管理的大趋势。本文旨在记录绿色建筑报告在上市公司中的流行程度,评估公司如何应用绿色建筑的良好实践,并展示哪些公司、国家和行业部门在绿色建筑技术的应用方面特别先进。设计/方法/方法该研究使用了经济合作与发展组织成员国不同行业的1,281家上市公司在5年期间的绿色建筑报告、绿色建筑评分和公司特征数据。采用回归分析将绿色建筑报告的采用和绿色建筑的卓越性与公司特征联系起来。研究结果表明,不同国家和行业的企业房地产管理在绿色建筑活动和报告方面存在巨大差异。研究发现,金融和医疗保健行业的公司在绿色建筑报告方面处于领先地位。以环境、社会和公司治理为导向、盈利的大型企业获得了最高的绿色建筑得分。研究的局限性/意义本文的结果依赖于已报道的但并非必然监测的绿色建筑活动。也可能有一些公司使用绿色建筑技术,但没有对其进行报告。结论主要基于相关性,不允许因果陈述(内生变量)。本文的研究结果对企业房地产从业者制定绿色建筑活动和报告的基准具有重要意义。此外,本文还揭示了绿色建筑信息在金融市场中的传播方式。该报告研究了25个国家和所有行业(1,281家公司)绿色建筑的驱动因素和障碍。与此相反,大多数现有文献侧重于单个国家,并将分析限制在房地产和建筑行业的公司。此外,该论文还共同关注可公开获得的绿色建筑报告和绿色建筑评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信