Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
D. Marikyan, S. Papagiannidis, G. Stewart
{"title":"Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis","authors":"D. Marikyan, S. Papagiannidis, G. Stewart","doi":"10.1177/01655515231191177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid digitalisation has resulted in a literature about technology acceptance that is ever increasing in size, naturally creating debates about the developments in the field and their implications. Given the size of the literature and the range of factors, theories and applications considered, this article reviewed the relevant literature using a meta-analytical approach. The objective of this review was twofold: (a) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors contributing to technology acceptance and investigate their effects, depending on theoretical underpinnings, and (b) to explore the conditions explaining the variance in the effects of predictors time-, application- and journal-wise. This review analysed data from 693 papers. A total of 21 independent predictors having differential effects on attitude, intention and use behaviour were found. The effects of the predictors were different depending on the theoretical frameworks they were related to. The analysis of the consistency of the role of the predictors suggested that there was no longitudinal change in their effect sizes. However, a significant variance was found when comparing predictors across research applications and the journals in which the papers were published. The analysis of publication bias demonstrated a tendency to publish studies with significant results, although no evidence was found of p-value manipulation.","PeriodicalId":54796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231191177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid digitalisation has resulted in a literature about technology acceptance that is ever increasing in size, naturally creating debates about the developments in the field and their implications. Given the size of the literature and the range of factors, theories and applications considered, this article reviewed the relevant literature using a meta-analytical approach. The objective of this review was twofold: (a) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors contributing to technology acceptance and investigate their effects, depending on theoretical underpinnings, and (b) to explore the conditions explaining the variance in the effects of predictors time-, application- and journal-wise. This review analysed data from 693 papers. A total of 21 independent predictors having differential effects on attitude, intention and use behaviour were found. The effects of the predictors were different depending on the theoretical frameworks they were related to. The analysis of the consistency of the role of the predictors suggested that there was no longitudinal change in their effect sizes. However, a significant variance was found when comparing predictors across research applications and the journals in which the papers were published. The analysis of publication bias demonstrated a tendency to publish studies with significant results, although no evidence was found of p-value manipulation.
技术接受度研究:元分析
快速的数字化导致了关于技术接受度的文献越来越多,自然引发了关于该领域发展及其影响的辩论。考虑到文献的规模和考虑的因素、理论和应用的范围,本文使用元分析方法回顾了相关文献。本综述的目的有两个:(a)根据理论基础,对影响技术接受度的因素进行全面分析,并调查其影响;(b)探索解释预测因子在时间、应用和期刊方面影响差异的条件。这篇综述分析了693篇论文的数据。共有21个独立的预测因子对态度、意图和使用行为有不同的影响。预测因子的效果因其所涉及的理论框架而异。对预测因子作用的一致性分析表明,它们的效应大小没有纵向变化。然而,当比较研究应用程序和论文发表的期刊的预测因子时,发现了显著的差异。对发表偏倚的分析表明,尽管没有发现p值操纵的证据,但发表具有显著结果的研究的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Science
Journal of Information Science 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Information Science is a peer-reviewed international journal of high repute covering topics of interest to all those researching and working in the sciences of information and knowledge management. The Editors welcome material on any aspect of information science theory, policy, application or practice that will advance thinking in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信