{"title":"Development of galvanic anode performance (GAP) test for assessing the longevity of galvanic anodes for reinforced concrete structures","authors":"Deepak K. Kamde, R. Pillai","doi":"10.5006/4305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NACE impact report (2016) states that nearly 50% of reinforced concrete (RC) structures experience major repair in about ten years. The existing approach of patch repair does not address the root cause and may not be durable – resulting in re-repair and huge economic loss. Galvanic anodes (GAs) are gaining widespread acceptance to achieve maintenance-free repair life for a few decades. However, a few GAs with inadequate characteristics are prematurely failing (within a few months). There are no short-term test methods to evaluate the longevity of GAs. Therefore, this work focuses on developing a short-term test method (Galvanic Anode Performance (GAP) test) to assess the longevity of GAs. For this, the GAP specimen was designed by simulating CP-protected RC structure as follows: (i) GA embedded in bedding mortar (i.e., anode), (ii) Nichrome mesh (i.e., cathode simulating rebars in RC structures), (iii) position of anode and cathode, (iv) application of potential difference (0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 V) to accelerate the degradation of GAs, and (v) electrolyte to simulate conductivity of concrete. Applied potentials > 5 V could not capture the difference in characteristics of GAs. However, potential differences of 0.5, 1, and 5 V could show the true behavior of GAs in various exposure conditions. Then, an approach is proposed to evaluate the service life of GAs. Possible reasons for the premature failure of anodes were investigated by evaluating pH and pore volume of encapsulating mortar. The GAP test can help practicing engineers to estimate the longevity of GAs.","PeriodicalId":10717,"journal":{"name":"Corrosion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrosion","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5006/4305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
NACE impact report (2016) states that nearly 50% of reinforced concrete (RC) structures experience major repair in about ten years. The existing approach of patch repair does not address the root cause and may not be durable – resulting in re-repair and huge economic loss. Galvanic anodes (GAs) are gaining widespread acceptance to achieve maintenance-free repair life for a few decades. However, a few GAs with inadequate characteristics are prematurely failing (within a few months). There are no short-term test methods to evaluate the longevity of GAs. Therefore, this work focuses on developing a short-term test method (Galvanic Anode Performance (GAP) test) to assess the longevity of GAs. For this, the GAP specimen was designed by simulating CP-protected RC structure as follows: (i) GA embedded in bedding mortar (i.e., anode), (ii) Nichrome mesh (i.e., cathode simulating rebars in RC structures), (iii) position of anode and cathode, (iv) application of potential difference (0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 V) to accelerate the degradation of GAs, and (v) electrolyte to simulate conductivity of concrete. Applied potentials > 5 V could not capture the difference in characteristics of GAs. However, potential differences of 0.5, 1, and 5 V could show the true behavior of GAs in various exposure conditions. Then, an approach is proposed to evaluate the service life of GAs. Possible reasons for the premature failure of anodes were investigated by evaluating pH and pore volume of encapsulating mortar. The GAP test can help practicing engineers to estimate the longevity of GAs.
期刊介绍:
CORROSION is the premier research journal featuring peer-reviewed technical articles from the world’s top researchers and provides a permanent record of progress in the science and technology of corrosion prevention and control. The scope of the journal includes the latest developments in areas of corrosion metallurgy, mechanisms, predictors, cracking (sulfide stress, stress corrosion, hydrogen-induced), passivation, and CO2 corrosion.
70+ years and over 7,100 peer-reviewed articles with advances in corrosion science and engineering have been published in CORROSION. The journal publishes seven article types – original articles, invited critical reviews, technical notes, corrosion communications fast-tracked for rapid publication, special research topic issues, research letters of yearly annual conference student poster sessions, and scientific investigations of field corrosion processes. CORROSION, the Journal of Science and Engineering, serves as an important communication platform for academics, researchers, technical libraries, and universities.
Articles considered for CORROSION should have significant permanent value and should accomplish at least one of the following objectives:
• Contribute awareness of corrosion phenomena,
• Advance understanding of fundamental process, and/or
• Further the knowledge of techniques and practices used to reduce corrosion.