The Emotional Resources Group: A Mixed Methods Practice-Based Study of a Transdiagnostic Emotion Regulation Group Intervention

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Rebekah Moore, D. Gillanders, S. Stuart
{"title":"The Emotional Resources Group: A Mixed Methods Practice-Based Study of a Transdiagnostic Emotion Regulation Group Intervention","authors":"Rebekah Moore, D. Gillanders, S. Stuart","doi":"10.3390/psychiatryint3040024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to understand if the emotional resource group (ERG), a transdiagnostic group intervention, significantly improved emotion regulation (ER) in the short and long term. Methods: Participants completed pre- and post-measures of emotional regulation, psychological distress, wellbeing, self-efficacy and confidence in managing mental health problems. Measures were repeated at three and six months post intervention. 14 participants completed a qualitative interview. Results: ER ability and secondary measures improved following the intervention, but the improvement was not maintained over the three and six month follow-up period. From the themes identified through thematic analysis, the ERG was part of a wider process of learning and change for most participants. Participants described changes in awareness, and implementation of new skills to manage their emotional difficulties. Conclusion: Overall the ERG was a positive experience for most participants, providing improvements in ER and other aspects of mental health. However, it is unclear if these improvements are sustained in the longer term. There may be many reasons for this, including fidelity to the ERG model and the short-term nature of the group. The ERG should be considered an option for participants with ER difficulties and further intervention should be offered when the ERG ends.","PeriodicalId":93808,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint3040024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to understand if the emotional resource group (ERG), a transdiagnostic group intervention, significantly improved emotion regulation (ER) in the short and long term. Methods: Participants completed pre- and post-measures of emotional regulation, psychological distress, wellbeing, self-efficacy and confidence in managing mental health problems. Measures were repeated at three and six months post intervention. 14 participants completed a qualitative interview. Results: ER ability and secondary measures improved following the intervention, but the improvement was not maintained over the three and six month follow-up period. From the themes identified through thematic analysis, the ERG was part of a wider process of learning and change for most participants. Participants described changes in awareness, and implementation of new skills to manage their emotional difficulties. Conclusion: Overall the ERG was a positive experience for most participants, providing improvements in ER and other aspects of mental health. However, it is unclear if these improvements are sustained in the longer term. There may be many reasons for this, including fidelity to the ERG model and the short-term nature of the group. The ERG should be considered an option for participants with ER difficulties and further intervention should be offered when the ERG ends.
情绪资源组:跨诊断情绪调节组干预的混合方法实践研究
目的:本研究旨在了解情绪资源组(ERG),一种跨诊断组干预,是否在短期和长期内显著改善了情绪调节(ER)。方法:参与者完成情绪调节、心理困扰、幸福感、自我效能感和处理心理健康问题的信心的前后测量。干预后三个月和六个月重复测量。14名参与者完成了定性访谈。结果:干预后ER能力和次要指标有所改善,但在三个月和六个月的随访期内没有保持这种改善。从通过主题分析确定的主题来看,ERG是大多数参与者更广泛的学习和变革过程的一部分。参与者描述了意识的变化,以及管理情绪困难的新技能的实施。结论:总体而言,ERG对大多数参与者来说是一种积极的体验,它改善了ER和心理健康的其他方面。然而,目前尚不清楚这些改善是否能长期持续下去。这可能有很多原因,包括对ERG模型的忠诚和团队的短期性质。ERG应被视为有ER困难的参与者的一种选择,并且应在ERG结束时提供进一步的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信