Evaluation of four biostimulants for the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation

IF 0.3 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Julio Gabriel-Ortega, Pablo Chonillo Pionce, Washington Narváez Campana, Tomas Fuentes Figueroa, Fernando Ayón Villao
{"title":"Evaluation of four biostimulants for the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation","authors":"Julio Gabriel-Ortega, Pablo Chonillo Pionce, Washington Narváez Campana, Tomas Fuentes Figueroa, Fernando Ayón Villao","doi":"10.36610/j.jsars.2022.130200069x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to evaluate four biostimulants in the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation, five treatments were applied at three developmental stages (growth, flowering and fruiting): T 1 Bioremedy (2.0 g/L), T 2 Grandsil (2.0 g/L), T 3 Control (water), T 4 Fossil (5.0 g/L), T 5 L-amino (2 cm 3 /L). The treatments were distributed in a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and evaluated in a completely randomised experimental design. Each experimental unit consisted of three rows. The response variables were: plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), number of fruits per plant, fruit volume (cm 3 ) and fruit weight (kg). The results, cucumber in monoculture did not present notable differences for any of the evaluated variables, with the exception of plant height, significant differences were observed at P<0.05 of probability, Bioremedy, L-amino and control were the best. In tomato monoculture, there were significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables, with Bioremedy standing out for plant height, stem diameter, fruit weight, fruit diameter and fruit number. In the associated crop, both cucumber and tomato had significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables evaluated, with Bioremedy being the best.","PeriodicalId":53763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsars.2022.130200069x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to evaluate four biostimulants in the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation, five treatments were applied at three developmental stages (growth, flowering and fruiting): T 1 Bioremedy (2.0 g/L), T 2 Grandsil (2.0 g/L), T 3 Control (water), T 4 Fossil (5.0 g/L), T 5 L-amino (2 cm 3 /L). The treatments were distributed in a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and evaluated in a completely randomised experimental design. Each experimental unit consisted of three rows. The response variables were: plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), number of fruits per plant, fruit volume (cm 3 ) and fruit weight (kg). The results, cucumber in monoculture did not present notable differences for any of the evaluated variables, with the exception of plant height, significant differences were observed at P<0.05 of probability, Bioremedy, L-amino and control were the best. In tomato monoculture, there were significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables, with Bioremedy standing out for plant height, stem diameter, fruit weight, fruit diameter and fruit number. In the associated crop, both cucumber and tomato had significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables evaluated, with Bioremedy being the best.
四种生物刺激剂在单一栽培和相关温室栽培中诱导黄瓜(Cucumis sativus L.)和番茄(Solanum lycopersicum Mill.)系统抗性的评价
为了评价4种生物刺激物对黄瓜(Cucumis sativus L.)和番茄(Solanum lycopersicum Mill.)单作和联合温室栽培中系统抗性的诱导作用,在生长、开花和结果的3个发育阶段(生长、开花和结果)施用5种处理:t1 Bioremedy (2.0 g/L)、t2 Grandsil (2.0 g/L)、t3 Control(水)、t4 Fossil (5.0 g/L)、t1 L-amino (2 cm 3 /L)。处理按3 × 5因子排列,并在完全随机的实验设计中进行评估。每个实验单元由三排组成。响应变量为:株高(cm)、茎粗(mm)、单株果数、果体积(cm 3)和果重(kg)。结果表明,单作黄瓜各评价变量间差异不显著,除株高差异显著(P<0.05),以bioremed、L-amino和对照效果最好。在番茄单作中,各变量间差异均显著(P<0.05),其中Bioremedy在株高、茎粗、果重、果径和果数方面表现突出。在伴生作物中,黄瓜和番茄在所有评价变量上均有显著差异(P<0.05),以Bioremedy最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信