{"title":"Influence of Physical Activity on Heart Rate Variability in Physically Inactive Adults","authors":"L. Kong, Qin Yang","doi":"10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis aimed to examine the influences of physical activity (PA) interventions on heart rate variability (HRV) \n among healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years old. PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases \n were searched in September 2021. The eligibility criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed articles in English; (2) randomized controlled \n trials; (3) healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years; (4) at least two-week PA intervention; (5) available \n frequency domain result. The data were extracted to a pre-designed form. The primary outcome of this study was the frequency \n domain of HRV, which included natural log-transformed total power, low frequency and high frequency (lnTP, lnLF and lnHF), normalized \n units of LF and HF (LFnu and HFnu), and LF/HF ratio. Pooled estimates of differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the \n PA intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) were obtained using random-effects models. Six studies were identified in the \n meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between IG and CG in lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48), \n lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84), lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81) \n and LF/HF ratio(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14). The results indicated that the LFnu in IG was \n significantly lower than that in CG (MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01) while HFnu in IG was \n significantly higher than that in CG (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01). The increased HFnu and \n decreased LFnu after PA interventions indicated a more balanced autonomic nervous system. HRV may be a mediator between PA \n intervention and other health benefits. The measurements of HRV were inconsistent and increased the variation between studies. \n The sample sizes of IG or CG in the included studies were small (range from 9 to 26), which limited the power to detect significant \n differences. This study did not analyze the influence of dose-response and different types of PA interventions due to the limited number \n of eligible studies. The current evidence suggested that PA interventions benefit HRV in healthy but physically inactive adults \n aged 18 to 65 years old. Future research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":73469,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical activity and health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical activity and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to examine the influences of physical activity (PA) interventions on heart rate variability (HRV)
among healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years old. PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases
were searched in September 2021. The eligibility criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed articles in English; (2) randomized controlled
trials; (3) healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years; (4) at least two-week PA intervention; (5) available
frequency domain result. The data were extracted to a pre-designed form. The primary outcome of this study was the frequency
domain of HRV, which included natural log-transformed total power, low frequency and high frequency (lnTP, lnLF and lnHF), normalized
units of LF and HF (LFnu and HFnu), and LF/HF ratio. Pooled estimates of differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the
PA intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) were obtained using random-effects models. Six studies were identified in the
meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between IG and CG in lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48),
lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84), lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81)
and LF/HF ratio(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14). The results indicated that the LFnu in IG was
significantly lower than that in CG (MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01) while HFnu in IG was
significantly higher than that in CG (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01). The increased HFnu and
decreased LFnu after PA interventions indicated a more balanced autonomic nervous system. HRV may be a mediator between PA
intervention and other health benefits. The measurements of HRV were inconsistent and increased the variation between studies.
The sample sizes of IG or CG in the included studies were small (range from 9 to 26), which limited the power to detect significant
differences. This study did not analyze the influence of dose-response and different types of PA interventions due to the limited number
of eligible studies. The current evidence suggested that PA interventions benefit HRV in healthy but physically inactive adults
aged 18 to 65 years old. Future research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm our findings.