Prefabrication and Transnational Building Materials in Modern India

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Priya Jain
{"title":"Prefabrication and Transnational Building Materials in Modern India","authors":"Priya Jain","doi":"10.1080/13264826.2023.2195192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the introduction of European prefabrication building systems in India in the years immediately after independence from Britain in 1947, through the lens of two episodes. In each case, the analysis challenges the often-perceived notion of the local, in this case Indian, actors in the Global South as mere recipients of superior foreign technologies, positing them instead as critical assessors, evaluators and decision makers. In the first example of UK’s Alcrete House, well known as the reason for German architect Otto Koenigsberger’s infamous departure from India, the paper examines archival materials, discussed here for the first time, to shed light on the role of Indian players who demanded accountability from foreign experts. In the second lesser-known example of the Swiss lightweight concrete building product, Durisol, the analysis highlights the role of local architects like Shaukat Rai, who deployed his own transnational and intranational networks in the product’s bid to enter the Indian construction market in the early 1950s.","PeriodicalId":43786,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Theory Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"519 - 546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Theory Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2023.2195192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the introduction of European prefabrication building systems in India in the years immediately after independence from Britain in 1947, through the lens of two episodes. In each case, the analysis challenges the often-perceived notion of the local, in this case Indian, actors in the Global South as mere recipients of superior foreign technologies, positing them instead as critical assessors, evaluators and decision makers. In the first example of UK’s Alcrete House, well known as the reason for German architect Otto Koenigsberger’s infamous departure from India, the paper examines archival materials, discussed here for the first time, to shed light on the role of Indian players who demanded accountability from foreign experts. In the second lesser-known example of the Swiss lightweight concrete building product, Durisol, the analysis highlights the role of local architects like Shaukat Rai, who deployed his own transnational and intranational networks in the product’s bid to enter the Indian construction market in the early 1950s.
现代印度的预制和跨国建筑材料
摘要本文通过两集的镜头分析了1947年印度脱离英国独立后几年欧洲预制建筑系统在印度的引入。在每一种情况下,分析都挑战了人们通常认为的全球南方的当地(在本例中是印度)行为者仅仅是外国先进技术的接受者的观念,将他们定位为关键的评估者、评估者和决策者。在英国Alcrete House的第一个例子中,该论文研究了这里首次讨论的档案材料,以阐明要求外国专家承担责任的印度参与者的作用。在瑞士轻质混凝土建筑产品的第二个鲜为人知的例子Durisol中,分析强调了Shaukat Rai等当地建筑师的作用,他在20世纪50年代初为该产品进入印度建筑市场而部署了自己的跨国和国内网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信