Public participation power dynamics in strategic development planning in a metropolitan municipality: Eastern Cape Province

M. Sibanda, L. Lues
{"title":"Public participation power dynamics in strategic development planning in a metropolitan municipality: Eastern Cape Province","authors":"M. Sibanda, L. Lues","doi":"10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes does not occur in a vacuum; it is juxtaposed within contextual community realities of power, politics, institutional, systemic practices, cultures and inequities in resource capacity, amongst other relational social practices.Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the nature of power dynamics in participatory governance platforms and spaces during municipal strategic development planning processes and the extent to which they impact developmental outcomes in a metropolitan municipality.Setting: A metropolitan municipality in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.Methods: An interpretive, constructivist, cross-sectional exploratory case study collected in-depth qualitative data from purposefully sampled participants (n = 34) using focus-group discussions. Qualitative data were processed using NVivo 8 computer software and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.Results: The results indicated mixed views on participants’ satisfaction with public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes. Participants reported inadequate knowledge, capacity and capability; resource limits; political exclusion and language barriers, which muted community voice and disempowered, marginalised and excluded some residents from meaningfully participating and articulating community voice, priorities and needs.Conclusion: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning in the metropolitan municipality is at best tokenistic, constituting mere ‘window dressing,’ co-option and ‘pretence’ of inclusion of communities/residents in public participation platforms and spaces. Whilst on the surface, public participation appears inclusive of a range of stakeholders, at best powerful andr elite interests shape strategic development planning outcomes. A local governance framework for enhancing community voice in public participation platforms and spaces is recommended.","PeriodicalId":34771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes does not occur in a vacuum; it is juxtaposed within contextual community realities of power, politics, institutional, systemic practices, cultures and inequities in resource capacity, amongst other relational social practices.Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the nature of power dynamics in participatory governance platforms and spaces during municipal strategic development planning processes and the extent to which they impact developmental outcomes in a metropolitan municipality.Setting: A metropolitan municipality in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.Methods: An interpretive, constructivist, cross-sectional exploratory case study collected in-depth qualitative data from purposefully sampled participants (n = 34) using focus-group discussions. Qualitative data were processed using NVivo 8 computer software and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.Results: The results indicated mixed views on participants’ satisfaction with public participation in municipal strategic development planning processes. Participants reported inadequate knowledge, capacity and capability; resource limits; political exclusion and language barriers, which muted community voice and disempowered, marginalised and excluded some residents from meaningfully participating and articulating community voice, priorities and needs.Conclusion: Public participation in municipal strategic development planning in the metropolitan municipality is at best tokenistic, constituting mere ‘window dressing,’ co-option and ‘pretence’ of inclusion of communities/residents in public participation platforms and spaces. Whilst on the surface, public participation appears inclusive of a range of stakeholders, at best powerful andr elite interests shape strategic development planning outcomes. A local governance framework for enhancing community voice in public participation platforms and spaces is recommended.
东开普省一个大都市城市战略发展规划中的公众参与权力动态
背景:公众参与城市战略发展规划进程不是在真空中进行的;它与权力、政治、制度、系统实践、文化和资源能力不平等以及其他关系社会实践等背景社区现实并置。目的:本研究的目的是探索城市战略发展规划过程中参与式治理平台和空间中权力动态的性质,以及它们对大都市发展成果的影响程度。背景:南非东开普省的一个大都市。方法:一项解释性、建构主义、横断面探索性案例研究,通过焦点小组讨论,从有意抽样的参与者(n=34)中收集了深入的定性数据。定性数据使用NVivo 8计算机软件进行处理,并使用专题分析方法进行分析。结果:研究结果表明,参与者对公众参与城市战略发展规划过程的满意度参差不齐。与会者报告说,知识、能力和能力不足;资源限制;政治排斥和语言障碍,削弱了社区的声音,剥夺、边缘化和排斥了一些居民有意义地参与和表达社区的声音、优先事项和需求。结论:公众参与大都会城市的城市战略发展规划充其量只是象征性的,只是将社区/居民纳入公众参与平台和空间的“粉饰”、“共同选择”和“伪装”。从表面上看,公众参与似乎包括一系列利益相关者,充其量是强大的精英利益决定了战略发展规划的结果。建议建立一个地方治理框架,以提高社区在公众参与平台和空间中的发言权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信