Generic military simulation of a complex workplace. A new tool for applied research in military settings.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Military Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1080/08995605.2021.2000319
Alexander Witzki, Alexander Sievert, Kristina Küper, Dieter Leyk, Ursa K J Nagler
{"title":"Generic military simulation of a complex workplace. A new tool for applied research in military settings.","authors":"Alexander Witzki, Alexander Sievert, Kristina Küper, Dieter Leyk, Ursa K J Nagler","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2021.2000319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In almost any military occupational specialty soldiers must monitor and react to stimuli, store and process information, make and communicate decisions, while using different in- and output modalities. When assessing influences on performance, e.g., by sleep-deprivation or heat-stress in intervention designs, researchers face a dilemma: They can either examine highly trained military experts in their jobs, thus risking limited generalizability of their results, or use standard measures of cognitive performance with little ecological relevance. To solve this dilemma, we developed a multidimensional job simulation by abstracting a wide range of military jobs into a generic military simulation of a complex workplace (GEMS COW). It had to meet the following requirements: 1) validly and reliably measure the relevant psychological constructs of the abstracted jobs, 2) require only minimal training, and 3) score high acceptance with military specialists. GEMS COW assesses attention, short-term memory (sm), and working memory (wm) in a lifelike setting. Three studies were conducted focusing on psychometric properties (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 74), overall task complexity in an intervention design (Study 2, <i>N</i> = 54), and acceptance (Study 3, <i>N</i> = 22) of GEMS COW. Psychometric properties proved satisfactory (construct validities: wm = .58, attention = .45, sm =.68; retest reliability: .61-.90). The simulation has a medium to high mental difficulty and soldiers accept it as a realistic military task. GEMS COW is easy to learn and reliably measures psychological constructs in a complex generic simulation. It can be used in intervention studies and may easily be implemented in other languages.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"114-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10790801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.2000319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In almost any military occupational specialty soldiers must monitor and react to stimuli, store and process information, make and communicate decisions, while using different in- and output modalities. When assessing influences on performance, e.g., by sleep-deprivation or heat-stress in intervention designs, researchers face a dilemma: They can either examine highly trained military experts in their jobs, thus risking limited generalizability of their results, or use standard measures of cognitive performance with little ecological relevance. To solve this dilemma, we developed a multidimensional job simulation by abstracting a wide range of military jobs into a generic military simulation of a complex workplace (GEMS COW). It had to meet the following requirements: 1) validly and reliably measure the relevant psychological constructs of the abstracted jobs, 2) require only minimal training, and 3) score high acceptance with military specialists. GEMS COW assesses attention, short-term memory (sm), and working memory (wm) in a lifelike setting. Three studies were conducted focusing on psychometric properties (Study 1, N = 74), overall task complexity in an intervention design (Study 2, N = 54), and acceptance (Study 3, N = 22) of GEMS COW. Psychometric properties proved satisfactory (construct validities: wm = .58, attention = .45, sm =.68; retest reliability: .61-.90). The simulation has a medium to high mental difficulty and soldiers accept it as a realistic military task. GEMS COW is easy to learn and reliably measures psychological constructs in a complex generic simulation. It can be used in intervention studies and may easily be implemented in other languages.

复杂工作场所的通用军事模拟。一种用于军事环境应用研究的新工具
在几乎所有的军事职业专业中,士兵都必须在使用不同的输入和输出模式的同时,对刺激进行监测并做出反应、存储和处理信息、做出决策并进行交流。在评估对工作表现的影响时,例如在干预设计中评估睡眠不足或热应激对工作表现的影响时,研究人员面临着一个两难选择:要么对训练有素的军事专家在其工作中的表现进行检查,从而冒着结果的推广性有限的风险;要么使用与生态相关性很小的认知表现标准测量方法。为解决这一难题,我们开发了一种多维工作模拟,将各种军事工作抽象为复杂工作场所的通用军事模拟(GEMS COW)。它必须满足以下要求:1)有效、可靠地测量抽象工作的相关心理结构;2)只需最低限度的培训;3)获得军事专家的高度认可。GEMS COW 在逼真的环境中评估注意力、短期记忆(SM)和工作记忆(WM)。共进行了三项研究,分别侧重于 GEMS COW 的心理测量特性(研究 1,N = 74)、干预设计中的总体任务复杂性(研究 2,N = 54)和接受程度(研究 3,N = 22)。心理测量特性令人满意(结构效度:WM = .58,注意力 = .45,SM = .68;重测信度:.61-.90)。模拟训练的心理难度为中等至高等,士兵们将其视为逼真的军事任务。GEMS COW 简单易学,能在复杂的通用模拟中可靠地测量心理结构。它可用于干预研究,并易于用其他语言实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Psychology
Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信