EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRENGTH OF HAND-LAMINATED AND VACUUM BAGGED QUASI-ISOTROPIC GLASS-EPOXY COMPOSITES AGAISNT THE ISO 12215-5

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez, Juli Laci
{"title":"EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRENGTH OF HAND-LAMINATED AND VACUUM BAGGED QUASI-ISOTROPIC GLASS-EPOXY COMPOSITES AGAISNT THE ISO 12215-5","authors":"Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez, Juli Laci","doi":"10.5750/ijme.v164ia2.1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glass fibre reinforced polymer composites are the most common materials employed for the manufacturing of small crafts. Their hull construction and scantlings are governed by the ISO 12215-5. The latest version of the standard introduced a new methodology to assess the ultimate strength of composites laminates. The regression equations based on the fibre weight fraction of the former version have been replaced by a more detailed ply-by-ply analysis. However, no validation data is available to ascertain the relevance of the default ultimate strengths provided by the ISO 12215-5:2019. This paper employs destructive testing to experimentally characterize the ultimate flexural, tensile and compressive strength of a quasi-isotropic glass-epoxy laminate. Experiments were undertaken in accordance with the ISO 178 for flexural properties, the ISO 527-4 for tensile properties, and the ISO 14126 for compressive properties. Two manufacturing techniques are investigated, namely hand lamination and vacuum bagging. The former represents a cheaper and therefore more common manufacturing option, while the latter is representative of an advanced manufacturing process. The key results show that the ISO 12215-5:2019 default ultimate strengths for the quasi-isotropic composite laminate tested are (i) conservative for the ultimate flexural strength, (ii) appropriate for the ultimate tensile strength, and (iii) optimistic for the ultimate compressive strength, especially for vacuum bagged samples, with the main cause identified as the value of the ultimate compressive breaking strain for chopped strand mat. These findings provide validation data for the ISO12215-5:2019. They may inform designers, compliance assessors and policy makers in the selection of relevant factors of safety for composite structures, and it is anticipated the results may contribute to future improvements in small craft regulations.","PeriodicalId":50313,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Maritime Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Maritime Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v164ia2.1178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Glass fibre reinforced polymer composites are the most common materials employed for the manufacturing of small crafts. Their hull construction and scantlings are governed by the ISO 12215-5. The latest version of the standard introduced a new methodology to assess the ultimate strength of composites laminates. The regression equations based on the fibre weight fraction of the former version have been replaced by a more detailed ply-by-ply analysis. However, no validation data is available to ascertain the relevance of the default ultimate strengths provided by the ISO 12215-5:2019. This paper employs destructive testing to experimentally characterize the ultimate flexural, tensile and compressive strength of a quasi-isotropic glass-epoxy laminate. Experiments were undertaken in accordance with the ISO 178 for flexural properties, the ISO 527-4 for tensile properties, and the ISO 14126 for compressive properties. Two manufacturing techniques are investigated, namely hand lamination and vacuum bagging. The former represents a cheaper and therefore more common manufacturing option, while the latter is representative of an advanced manufacturing process. The key results show that the ISO 12215-5:2019 default ultimate strengths for the quasi-isotropic composite laminate tested are (i) conservative for the ultimate flexural strength, (ii) appropriate for the ultimate tensile strength, and (iii) optimistic for the ultimate compressive strength, especially for vacuum bagged samples, with the main cause identified as the value of the ultimate compressive breaking strain for chopped strand mat. These findings provide validation data for the ISO12215-5:2019. They may inform designers, compliance assessors and policy makers in the selection of relevant factors of safety for composite structures, and it is anticipated the results may contribute to future improvements in small craft regulations.
手工层压和真空袋装准各向同性玻璃环氧复合材料强度的实验表征
玻璃纤维增强聚合物复合材料是用于制造小型工艺品的最常见材料。它们的船体结构和尺寸受ISO 12215-5的约束。该标准的最新版本引入了一种评估复合材料层压板极限强度的新方法。基于前一版本的纤维重量分数的回归方程已被更详细的逐层分析所取代。然而,没有可用的验证数据来确定ISO 12215-5:2019提供的默认极限强度的相关性。本文采用破坏性试验对准各向同性玻璃-环氧树脂层压板的极限弯曲、拉伸和压缩强度进行了实验表征。根据ISO 178的弯曲性能、ISO 527-4的拉伸性能和ISO 14126的压缩性能进行实验。研究了两种制造技术,即手工层压和真空装袋。前者代表更便宜,因此更常见的制造选择,而后者代表先进的制造工艺。关键结果表明,测试的准各向同性复合材料层压板的ISO 12215-5:2019默认极限强度(i)对于极限弯曲强度是保守的,(ii)对于极限拉伸强度是合适的,以及(iii)对于极限抗压强度是乐观的,特别是对于真空袋装样品,主要原因是短切毡的极限压缩断裂应变值。这些发现为ISO12215-5:2019提供了验证数据。他们可以告知设计师、合规性评估师和政策制定者选择复合材料结构的相关安全因素,预计结果可能有助于未来改进小型飞行器法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Maritime Engineering (IJME) provides a forum for the reporting and discussion on technical and scientific issues associated with the design and construction of commercial marine vessels . Contributions in the form of papers and notes, together with discussion on published papers are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信