How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning

IF 4.7 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jessica Di Cocco, Bernardo Monechi
{"title":"How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning","authors":"Jessica Di Cocco, Bernardo Monechi","doi":"10.1017/pan.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the main challenges in comparative studies on populism concerns its temporal and spatial measurements within and between a large number of parties and countries. Textual analysis has proved useful for these purposes, and automated methods can further improve research in this direction. Here, we propose a method to derive a score of parties’ levels of populism using supervised machine learning to perform textual analysis on national manifestos. We illustrate the advantages of our approach, which allows for measuring populism for a vast number of parties and countries without resource-intensive human-coding processes and provides accurate, updated information for temporal and spatial comparisons of populism. Furthermore, our method allows for obtaining a continuous score of populism, which ensures more fine-grained analyses of the party landscape while reducing the risk of arbitrary classifications. To illustrate the potential contribution of this score, we use it as a proxy for parties’ levels of populism, analyzing average trends in six European countries from the early 2000s for nearly two decades.","PeriodicalId":48270,"journal":{"name":"Political Analysis","volume":"30 1","pages":"311 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.29","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract One of the main challenges in comparative studies on populism concerns its temporal and spatial measurements within and between a large number of parties and countries. Textual analysis has proved useful for these purposes, and automated methods can further improve research in this direction. Here, we propose a method to derive a score of parties’ levels of populism using supervised machine learning to perform textual analysis on national manifestos. We illustrate the advantages of our approach, which allows for measuring populism for a vast number of parties and countries without resource-intensive human-coding processes and provides accurate, updated information for temporal and spatial comparisons of populism. Furthermore, our method allows for obtaining a continuous score of populism, which ensures more fine-grained analyses of the party landscape while reducing the risk of arbitrary classifications. To illustrate the potential contribution of this score, we use it as a proxy for parties’ levels of populism, analyzing average trends in six European countries from the early 2000s for nearly two decades.
政党有多民粹主义?用有监督的机器学习测量政党宣言中的民粹主义程度
摘要民粹主义比较研究的主要挑战之一是在大量政党和国家内部和之间对民粹主义的时间和空间测量。事实证明,文本分析对这些目的很有用,自动化方法可以进一步改进这方面的研究。在这里,我们提出了一种方法,使用监督机器学习对国家宣言进行文本分析,得出政党民粹主义水平的分数。我们展示了我们的方法的优势,该方法允许在没有资源密集型人力编码过程的情况下测量大量政党和国家的民粹主义,并为民粹主义的时间和空间比较提供准确、更新的信息。此外,我们的方法允许获得民粹主义的连续分数,这确保了对政党格局进行更精细的分析,同时降低了任意分类的风险。为了说明这一分数的潜在贡献,我们用它来衡量政党的民粹主义水平,分析了自21世纪初以来近20年来六个欧洲国家的平均趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Analysis
Political Analysis POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Political Analysis chronicles these exciting developments by publishing the most sophisticated scholarship in the field. It is the place to learn new methods, to find some of the best empirical scholarship, and to publish your best research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信