South Korea’s lift-off to development: The role of Human Capital and Productivity in economic growth, 1960-1979

IF 0.1 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Francisco Quiero
{"title":"South Korea’s lift-off to development: The role of Human Capital and Productivity in economic growth, 1960-1979","authors":"Francisco Quiero","doi":"10.17230/map.v10.i19.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Korea is a case of impressive economic growth: a previously underdeveloped country that, after the 1960s, embarked on a process to achieve development before other underdeveloped countries. South Korea is also a case where innovation processes move from imitation to self-creation thanks to a quick updating or “catching up” process. South Korea’s journey from underdevelopment to development has sparked a rich and well-founded debate within economic theory. These debates weigh the roles of productive factors (Physical, Human, Social, and Financial Capital, Labor, resources, environment), economic agents (State, Firms, Banks), and international trade factors (FDI, Imports, Exports) on its growth process. The central argument of this article establishes that Capital is the central variable that explains the successful outcome of the Korean growth miracle. However, Capital composition is even more important. The impact of Human Capital on the growth process evinces a synergy with Knowledge development. We modify the Solow model using Human, Physical Capital, and Total Factor Productivity as independent variables in a Multivariable Regression Model for the period between 1960 and 1979 on Output per worker. We conclude that Human Capital and Productivity are just as important as Physical Capital for explaining growth per worker in South Korea due their synergistic properties. The study is restricted to the years prior to Park Chung-Hee’s rise to power and ends with his assassination.","PeriodicalId":40515,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital Mundo Asia Pacifico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital Mundo Asia Pacifico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/map.v10.i19.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

South Korea is a case of impressive economic growth: a previously underdeveloped country that, after the 1960s, embarked on a process to achieve development before other underdeveloped countries. South Korea is also a case where innovation processes move from imitation to self-creation thanks to a quick updating or “catching up” process. South Korea’s journey from underdevelopment to development has sparked a rich and well-founded debate within economic theory. These debates weigh the roles of productive factors (Physical, Human, Social, and Financial Capital, Labor, resources, environment), economic agents (State, Firms, Banks), and international trade factors (FDI, Imports, Exports) on its growth process. The central argument of this article establishes that Capital is the central variable that explains the successful outcome of the Korean growth miracle. However, Capital composition is even more important. The impact of Human Capital on the growth process evinces a synergy with Knowledge development. We modify the Solow model using Human, Physical Capital, and Total Factor Productivity as independent variables in a Multivariable Regression Model for the period between 1960 and 1979 on Output per worker. We conclude that Human Capital and Productivity are just as important as Physical Capital for explaining growth per worker in South Korea due their synergistic properties. The study is restricted to the years prior to Park Chung-Hee’s rise to power and ends with his assassination.
韩国的发展:人力资本和生产力在经济增长中的作用,1960-1979
韩国是一个令人印象深刻的经济增长的例子:一个以前不发达的国家,在20世纪60年代之后,先于其他不发达国家开始了实现发展的进程。韩国也是通过快速的更新或“追赶”过程,从模仿到自主创造的创新过程。韩国从欠发达到发达的历程在经济理论领域引发了一场丰富而有根据的辩论。这些辩论权衡了生产因素(物质、人力、社会和金融资本、劳动力、资源、环境)、经济主体(国家、企业、银行)和国际贸易因素(外国直接投资、进口、出口)在其增长过程中的作用。本文的中心论点确立了资本是解释韩国增长奇迹成功结果的中心变量。然而,资本构成更为重要。人力资本对增长过程的影响与知识发展具有协同效应。我们修改了索洛模型,将人力、物质资本和全要素生产率作为1960年至1979年期间人均产出的多变量回归模型中的自变量。我们得出结论,人力资本和生产率与物质资本一样重要,因为它们具有协同特性,可以解释韩国人均工人的增长。这项研究仅限于朴正熙上台之前的几年,直到他被暗杀为止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书