Temporal stability of calibration functions in the traditional pure rotational Raman lidar technique

IF 1.6 Q3 OPTICS
OSA Continuum Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1364/OSAC.404945
V. V. Gerasimov
{"title":"Temporal stability of calibration functions in the traditional pure rotational Raman lidar technique","authors":"V. V. Gerasimov","doi":"10.1364/OSAC.404945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pure rotational Raman (PRR) lidars should be calibrated to measure atmospheric temperature. In the frame of the traditional PRR technique, the lidar calibration represents the determination of calibration function (CF) coefficients using a reference temperature profile from an atmosphere model or radiosonde data. When a measurement campaign lasts several days, the accuracy of temperature retrieval from PRR lidar signals depends on the temporal stability of the selected CF. In this paper, we present a simple way to intercompare different CFs and determine the most stable function in time among them. We study to what extent the CF coefficients determined on one of the measurement campaign days may be used for temperature retrieval on the other days. We also examine the situation when reference radiosonde data are absent on one of the measurement days and, therefore, the CF coefficients need to be determined from reference data over the remaining days. The 1-week and 3-day temporal stabilities of five CFs are studied on the example of nighttime temperature profiles retrieved from PRR lidar measurements of 1, 6, 7, and 8 April 2015. The stability of these CFs is studied for the first time. The measurements were performed in Tomsk (56.48°N, 85.05°E, Western Siberia, Russia) using a PRR lidar of the Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems (IMCES). The CF retrieving temperature of the troposphere (3–9 km) with the highest accuracy for the considered 1-week and 3-day measurement periods is determined for the IMCES lidar.","PeriodicalId":19750,"journal":{"name":"OSA Continuum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSA Continuum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/OSAC.404945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pure rotational Raman (PRR) lidars should be calibrated to measure atmospheric temperature. In the frame of the traditional PRR technique, the lidar calibration represents the determination of calibration function (CF) coefficients using a reference temperature profile from an atmosphere model or radiosonde data. When a measurement campaign lasts several days, the accuracy of temperature retrieval from PRR lidar signals depends on the temporal stability of the selected CF. In this paper, we present a simple way to intercompare different CFs and determine the most stable function in time among them. We study to what extent the CF coefficients determined on one of the measurement campaign days may be used for temperature retrieval on the other days. We also examine the situation when reference radiosonde data are absent on one of the measurement days and, therefore, the CF coefficients need to be determined from reference data over the remaining days. The 1-week and 3-day temporal stabilities of five CFs are studied on the example of nighttime temperature profiles retrieved from PRR lidar measurements of 1, 6, 7, and 8 April 2015. The stability of these CFs is studied for the first time. The measurements were performed in Tomsk (56.48°N, 85.05°E, Western Siberia, Russia) using a PRR lidar of the Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems (IMCES). The CF retrieving temperature of the troposphere (3–9 km) with the highest accuracy for the considered 1-week and 3-day measurement periods is determined for the IMCES lidar.
传统纯旋转拉曼激光雷达标定函数的时间稳定性
纯旋转拉曼(PRR)激光雷达应该被校准以测量大气温度。在传统的PRR技术框架中,激光雷达校准代表了使用来自大气模式或无线电探空数据的参考温度廓线确定校准函数(CF)系数。当测量活动持续数天时,从PRR激光雷达信号中获取温度的准确性取决于所选CF的时间稳定性。在本文中,我们提出了一种简单的方法来相互比较不同的CF,并确定其中最稳定的时间函数。我们研究在一个测量活动日确定的CF系数在多大程度上可以用于其他日子的温度检索。我们还研究了在某一个测量日缺少参考无线电探空数据的情况,因此,CF系数需要从其余日子的参考数据中确定。以2015年4月1日、6日、7日和8日PRR激光雷达测得的夜间温度曲线为例,研究了5个CFs的1周和3天时间稳定性。本文首次对这些碳纤维的稳定性进行了研究。利用俄罗斯气候与生态系统监测研究所(IMCES)的PRR激光雷达,在俄罗斯西伯利亚西部的托木斯克(56.48°N, 85.05°E)进行测量。在考虑的1周和3天的测量周期内,确定了IMCES激光雷达对对流层(3-9公里)温度的CF检索精度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OSA Continuum
OSA Continuum OPTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信