Violent memories/memory violence

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2017.1279505

G. White

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This review takes up three works that represent recent approaches to the anthropology of memory and affect. Echoing themes in Holocaust literature, a central issue here is the role of violent memory in forging collective identifications and sentiments. Taken together, these volumes suggest a continuing evolution of efforts to theorize the remembrance of violence and the social and bodily practices that mediate its reproduction. In particular, these studies demonstrate the value of ethnography in tracing the social career of violent memory as it is variously projected, suppressed, and transformed in moral communities and across generations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

暴力记忆/记忆暴力

摘要：本文综述了三部代表记忆与情感人类学最新研究方法的著作。与大屠杀文学中的主题相呼应，这里的一个核心问题是暴力记忆在形成集体认同和情感中的作用。总之，这些卷表明，对暴力的记忆以及调节其再现的社会和身体实践的理论化努力正在不断演变。特别是，这些研究证明了民族志在追踪暴力记忆的社会生涯方面的价值，因为它在道德社区和几代人之间受到了不同的投射、压制和转变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.