{"title":"Regularity of semantic change in Romance anatomical terms","authors":"James Law","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21046.law","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While semantic change is notoriously idiosyncratic, cross-linguistic evidence suggests some general trends in the\n directions and mechanisms of semantic shifts. Notable among these are trends applying to the target domain of the human body, a\n domain that has received considerable attention due to its universality. However, broad surveys of many languages risk missing\n significant details. Data from the Dictionnaire étymologique et cognitif des langues romanes (DECOLAR) on the\n etymologies of terms for 97 body parts in 14 Romance languages calls some proposed trends into question. In particular,\n counterexamples are found to a supposed unidirectional shift from visible parts to the wholes that include them. Analysis of\n individual changes reveals contextual factors that can cause a lexical trend to not apply. The findings contribute to a more\n complex model of metaphorization and metonymization, the primary processes involved in lexical semantic change.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21046.law","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While semantic change is notoriously idiosyncratic, cross-linguistic evidence suggests some general trends in the
directions and mechanisms of semantic shifts. Notable among these are trends applying to the target domain of the human body, a
domain that has received considerable attention due to its universality. However, broad surveys of many languages risk missing
significant details. Data from the Dictionnaire étymologique et cognitif des langues romanes (DECOLAR) on the
etymologies of terms for 97 body parts in 14 Romance languages calls some proposed trends into question. In particular,
counterexamples are found to a supposed unidirectional shift from visible parts to the wholes that include them. Analysis of
individual changes reveals contextual factors that can cause a lexical trend to not apply. The findings contribute to a more
complex model of metaphorization and metonymization, the primary processes involved in lexical semantic change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.