Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory, Statistics and Econometrics, and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey
{"title":"Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory, Statistics and Econometrics, and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey","authors":"Cynthia L. Harter, Carlos J. Asarta","doi":"10.1177/05694345211037904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an extension of a recent article published in The American Economist (Asarta et al., 2021) and presents the second report of basic findings from the 2020 online administration of the sixth national quinquennial survey on teaching and assessment methods in economics. Consistent with the results from the first report, we find that “chalk and talk” remains the staple method of instruction across the entire undergraduate economics curriculum. Lessons, activities, and references that address diversity, inclusion, or gender issues are almost never used in intermediate theory, statistics and econometrics, and other upper-division field courses. There has been notable growth in the use of cooperative learning/small-group assignments, as well as in instructor-led and “student(s) with student(s)” discussions over the past 25 years. Overall, however, there have been minimal changes in teaching methods over time. JEL Classifications : A20, A22","PeriodicalId":85623,"journal":{"name":"The American economist","volume":"67 1","pages":"132 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American economist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345211037904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
This article is an extension of a recent article published in The American Economist (Asarta et al., 2021) and presents the second report of basic findings from the 2020 online administration of the sixth national quinquennial survey on teaching and assessment methods in economics. Consistent with the results from the first report, we find that “chalk and talk” remains the staple method of instruction across the entire undergraduate economics curriculum. Lessons, activities, and references that address diversity, inclusion, or gender issues are almost never used in intermediate theory, statistics and econometrics, and other upper-division field courses. There has been notable growth in the use of cooperative learning/small-group assignments, as well as in instructor-led and “student(s) with student(s)” discussions over the past 25 years. Overall, however, there have been minimal changes in teaching methods over time. JEL Classifications : A20, A22
本文是最近发表在《美国经济学家》(Asarta et al., 2021)上的一篇文章的延伸,并介绍了2020年第六次全国五年期经济学教学和评估方法调查在线管理的基本发现的第二份报告。与第一份报告的结果一致,我们发现“粉笔和谈话”仍然是整个本科经济学课程的主要教学方法。涉及多样性、包容性或性别问题的课程、活动和参考资料几乎从未用于中级理论、统计和计量经济学以及其他高级领域课程。在过去的25年里,合作学习/小组作业的使用,以及教师主导和“学生与学生”讨论的使用都有了显著的增长。然而,总的来说,随着时间的推移,教学方法的变化很小。JEL分类:A20, A22