¿Legitimidades fragmentadas? Apoyo a la democracia en la región andina

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Daniel Moreno Morales, Daniela Osorio Michel
{"title":"¿Legitimidades fragmentadas? Apoyo a la democracia en la región andina","authors":"Daniel Moreno Morales, Daniela Osorio Michel","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint110.2022.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Objective/Context : Citizen support for democracy is in question. In the Latin American case, after having increased at the beginning of the 21 st century, indicators of support for democracy showed marked decline throughout the last decade. This is particularly evident in the Andean countries, where recent setbacks in the legitimacy of democratic institutions have been accompanied by problematic electoral processes that were deeply questioned by their citizens. Methodology : Using recent data from two of the main sources of comparative public opinion available for Latin America—AmericasBarometer and the World Values Survey— this work focuses on indicators of citizen support for democracy in four countries of the Andean region (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru), investigating the effect of government approval on the evaluation of democracy. The study uses a methodological design that recognizes different levels of support for democracy, to discuss the hypothesis that effects should be different between the levels analyzed. Conclusions : The results show that more concrete levels of support for democracy are more strongly influenced by individual political positions, while the values that sustain democracy are not affected at a statistically significant level. Originality : The methodology allows identifying the multidimensionality of citizen support for democracy and how this support depends on different factors according to the studied level. The conclusions evidence the existence of dynamics common to different societies in relation to democracy.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint110.2022.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Objective/Context : Citizen support for democracy is in question. In the Latin American case, after having increased at the beginning of the 21 st century, indicators of support for democracy showed marked decline throughout the last decade. This is particularly evident in the Andean countries, where recent setbacks in the legitimacy of democratic institutions have been accompanied by problematic electoral processes that were deeply questioned by their citizens. Methodology : Using recent data from two of the main sources of comparative public opinion available for Latin America—AmericasBarometer and the World Values Survey— this work focuses on indicators of citizen support for democracy in four countries of the Andean region (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru), investigating the effect of government approval on the evaluation of democracy. The study uses a methodological design that recognizes different levels of support for democracy, to discuss the hypothesis that effects should be different between the levels analyzed. Conclusions : The results show that more concrete levels of support for democracy are more strongly influenced by individual political positions, while the values that sustain democracy are not affected at a statistically significant level. Originality : The methodology allows identifying the multidimensionality of citizen support for democracy and how this support depends on different factors according to the studied level. The conclusions evidence the existence of dynamics common to different societies in relation to democracy.
¿Legitimidades分裂?支持安第斯地区的民主
. 目标/背景:公民对民主的支持存在问题。在拉丁美洲,支持民主的指标在21世纪初有所增加,但在过去十年中却明显下降。这一点在安第斯国家尤其明显,在这些国家,民主体制的合法性最近受到挫折的同时,选举过程也出现了问题,受到其公民的深刻质疑。方法:利用拉丁美洲可获得的两个主要比较民意来源——美洲晴雨表和世界价值观调查——的最新数据,这项工作侧重于安第斯地区四个国家(玻利维亚、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔和秘鲁)公民支持民主的指标,调查政府批准对民主评估的影响。该研究采用了一种方法设计,可以识别对民主的不同支持水平,以讨论所分析的不同水平之间的影响应该不同的假设。结论:结果表明,个人政治立场对更具体的民主支持水平的影响更强烈,而维持民主的价值观在统计显著水平上没有受到影响。独创性:该方法可以识别公民对民主的支持的多维性,以及这种支持如何根据所研究的水平取决于不同的因素。这些结论证明了不同社会在民主方面存在着共同的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信