Decolonisation, Identity, Neo-Colonialism and Power

IF 0.7 0 PHILOSOPHY
Phronimon Pub Date : 2019-03-26 DOI:10.25159/2413-3086/3065
B. Olivier
{"title":"Decolonisation, Identity, Neo-Colonialism and Power","authors":"B. Olivier","doi":"10.25159/2413-3086/3065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the implications of “decolonisation,” first by focusing on the work of African thinker, Frantz Fanon’s work in this regard, particularly his insistence that decolonisation entails the creation of “new” people, before moving on to the related question of “identity.” Here the emphasis is on the work of Manuel Castells, specifically his examination of three kinds of identity-construction, the third of which he regards as being the most important category for understanding this process in the 21st century, namely “resistance identity.” It is argued that this casts the decolonisation debate in South Africa in an intelligible light. An interpretation of E.M. Forster’s paradigmatically “decolonising” novel, A Passage to India, is offered to unpack the meaning of the concept further, before switching the terrain to the question of the urgent need for a different kind of decolonisation, today, pertaining to the economic neo-colonisation of the world by neoliberal capitalism. The work of Hardt and Negri on the emerging world order under what they call “Empire” is indispensable in this regard, and their characterisation of the subject under neoliberal Empire in terms of the figures of the indebted, securitised, mediatised and represented, stresses the need for global decolonisation in the name of democracy. This part of the paper is concluded with a consideration of what decolonisation is really “all about,” namely power.","PeriodicalId":42048,"journal":{"name":"Phronimon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phronimon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/3065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of “decolonisation,” first by focusing on the work of African thinker, Frantz Fanon’s work in this regard, particularly his insistence that decolonisation entails the creation of “new” people, before moving on to the related question of “identity.” Here the emphasis is on the work of Manuel Castells, specifically his examination of three kinds of identity-construction, the third of which he regards as being the most important category for understanding this process in the 21st century, namely “resistance identity.” It is argued that this casts the decolonisation debate in South Africa in an intelligible light. An interpretation of E.M. Forster’s paradigmatically “decolonising” novel, A Passage to India, is offered to unpack the meaning of the concept further, before switching the terrain to the question of the urgent need for a different kind of decolonisation, today, pertaining to the economic neo-colonisation of the world by neoliberal capitalism. The work of Hardt and Negri on the emerging world order under what they call “Empire” is indispensable in this regard, and their characterisation of the subject under neoliberal Empire in terms of the figures of the indebted, securitised, mediatised and represented, stresses the need for global decolonisation in the name of democracy. This part of the paper is concluded with a consideration of what decolonisation is really “all about,” namely power.
非殖民化、身份认同、新殖民主义与权力
本文首先探讨了非洲思想家弗朗茨·法诺 (Frantz fanon)在这方面的工作,特别是他坚持非殖民化需要创造 - œnewâ -”人,然后再讨论与 - œidentity相关的问题,从而探讨了 - œdecolonisation -”的含义。这里的重点是曼纽尔·卡斯特(Manuel Castells)的作品,特别是他对三种身份建构的考察,他认为第三种身份建构是理解21世纪这一过程最重要的类别,即 - œresistance身份。有人认为,这使南非的非殖民化辩论变得容易理解。对E.M.福斯特 - - - œdecolonisingâ - - -的典型小说《印度之旅》的解读,在将话题转向与新自由主义资本主义对世界经济的新殖民主义有关的、当今迫切需要一种不同类型的去殖民化的问题之前,进一步揭示了这一概念的含义。哈特和内格里关于他们所谓的 - œEmpireâ -”下的新兴世界秩序的著作在这方面是不可或缺的,他们对新自由主义帝国下的主体的特征,即负债的、证券化的、中介化的和被代表的形象,强调了以民主的名义进行全球非殖民化的必要性。这一部分的结论是考虑什么是真正的去殖民化 - œall,即权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phronimon
Phronimon PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
25.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信