Tropical Topographies: Mapping the Malarial in The Calcutta Chromosome

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Priscilla Jolly
{"title":"Tropical Topographies: Mapping the Malarial in The Calcutta Chromosome","authors":"Priscilla Jolly","doi":"10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reads colonial archives of malaria in conjunction with Amitav Ghosh’s futuristic medical thriller The Calcutta Chromosome (1995) and contends that the novel, loosely based on Sir Roland Ross, ruptures narratives of colonial expertise. The colonial expertise on malaria is embodied by Ross, an officer in the Indian Medical Service; this is in contrast with the model of expertise proposed by the novel. While Ross’s expertise is predicated on the domination of nature and controlling diseased tropical landscapes, the novel resists imperial strategies of mapping and disease control. This paper argues that The Calcutta Chromosome presents an alternative attempt to map the malarial, rewriting history by displacing actors such as Ross and instead placing two colonial subjects, Murugan and Mangala, at the centre of new mapping practices. The novel further questions the notion of ‘colonial improvement’ which malaria facilitated in imperial regimes. Deviating from the colonial history of improving the native body and landscape as a cure for malaria, the novel foregrounds subjugated subjects working at the peripheries of laboratories and scientific practices and thus subverts the notion of the ‘improved subject’ by proposing the idea of the mutational, transformational ‘Calcutta chromosome.’","PeriodicalId":37374,"journal":{"name":"eTropic","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eTropic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reads colonial archives of malaria in conjunction with Amitav Ghosh’s futuristic medical thriller The Calcutta Chromosome (1995) and contends that the novel, loosely based on Sir Roland Ross, ruptures narratives of colonial expertise. The colonial expertise on malaria is embodied by Ross, an officer in the Indian Medical Service; this is in contrast with the model of expertise proposed by the novel. While Ross’s expertise is predicated on the domination of nature and controlling diseased tropical landscapes, the novel resists imperial strategies of mapping and disease control. This paper argues that The Calcutta Chromosome presents an alternative attempt to map the malarial, rewriting history by displacing actors such as Ross and instead placing two colonial subjects, Murugan and Mangala, at the centre of new mapping practices. The novel further questions the notion of ‘colonial improvement’ which malaria facilitated in imperial regimes. Deviating from the colonial history of improving the native body and landscape as a cure for malaria, the novel foregrounds subjugated subjects working at the peripheries of laboratories and scientific practices and thus subverts the notion of the ‘improved subject’ by proposing the idea of the mutational, transformational ‘Calcutta chromosome.’
热带地形学:在加尔各答染色体中绘制疟疾
本文结合Amitav Ghosh的未来医学惊悚片《加尔各答染色体》(The Calcutta Chromosome, 1995),阅读了殖民时期的疟疾档案,并认为这部松散地以罗兰·罗斯爵士为基础的小说,打破了殖民时期专业知识的叙述。罗斯是印第安医疗服务处的一名官员,体现了殖民地在疟疾方面的专业知识;这与小说中提出的专家模型形成了对比。虽然罗斯的专业知识是基于对自然的统治和对患病热带景观的控制,但这部小说抵制了帝国主义的制图和疾病控制策略。这篇论文认为,《加尔各答染色体》提供了绘制疟疾地图的另一种尝试,它通过取代罗斯这样的角色来重写历史,而把两个殖民主体——穆卢干和曼加拉——放在新的地图绘制实践的中心。这本小说进一步质疑了疟疾在帝国政权中促进的“殖民改善”的概念。不同于殖民时期将改善当地的身体和景观作为治疗疟疾的方法,新颖的前景征服了在实验室和科学实践的边缘工作的主体,从而通过提出突变、转化的“加尔各答染色体”的想法颠覆了“改进主体”的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eTropic
eTropic Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信