The Impact of Suspect Race and Precipitating Incident on Community Members’ Assessments of Deadly Force Reasonableness

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
L. Fridell, Christopher J. Marier
{"title":"The Impact of Suspect Race and Precipitating Incident on Community Members’ Assessments of Deadly Force Reasonableness","authors":"L. Fridell, Christopher J. Marier","doi":"10.1177/10887679221112601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contrast between many community members’ views about the extent to which force used by police is excessive and the criminal justice system’s determination of same suggests a “reasonableness divide.” Using survey data from 3,600 nationally representative adults, this study assessed one possible reason for this divide—that community members evaluate the reasonableness of deadly force using factors that are not considered in legal assessments. The results affirmed this divide—finding that community members’ evaluations of deadly force incidents are impacted by the race of the subject and by the precipitating event. Policy and research implications are presented.","PeriodicalId":51586,"journal":{"name":"Homicide Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"142 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homicide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221112601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The contrast between many community members’ views about the extent to which force used by police is excessive and the criminal justice system’s determination of same suggests a “reasonableness divide.” Using survey data from 3,600 nationally representative adults, this study assessed one possible reason for this divide—that community members evaluate the reasonableness of deadly force using factors that are not considered in legal assessments. The results affirmed this divide—finding that community members’ evaluations of deadly force incidents are impacted by the race of the subject and by the precipitating event. Policy and research implications are presented.
嫌疑人种族和突发事件对社区成员致命武力合理性评估的影响
许多社区成员对警察过度使用武力的程度的看法与刑事司法系统对此的判断形成了鲜明对比,这表明存在“合理性分歧”,这项研究评估了造成这种分歧的一个可能原因,即社区成员评估使用致命武力的合理性,而法律评估中没有考虑这些因素。研究结果证实了这种分歧——发现社区成员对致命武力事件的评估受到受受试者种族和引发事件的影响。介绍了政策和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Homicide Studies
Homicide Studies CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Homicide Studies is an interdisciplinary, international publication dedicated to the dissemination of empirical research addressing issues pertinent to the study of homicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信