Barriers to the efficiency of internal evaluation in Polish secondary schools

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joanna Oczkowicz, Jan M. Myszewski
{"title":"Barriers to the efficiency of internal evaluation in Polish secondary schools","authors":"Joanna Oczkowicz, Jan M. Myszewski","doi":"10.1108/qae-03-2022-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the system of factors influencing the efficiency of internal evaluation in Polish secondary schools.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData collected in interviews with evaluation experts and teachers on the barriers to the efficiency of internal evaluation and their causes were subjected to a qualitative cause-and-effect analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nFive barriers to the evaluation efficiency (6B model) and five actions of the school head stopping their impact (6A model) were identified. The latter include selecting the key evaluation function (3KEF model) and ensuring the conditions for efficiency in the improvement loop.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAlthough the research was carried out in Polish schools, the conclusions indicate regularities affecting organizations throughout the world.\n\n\nPractical implications\nStudents’ educational needs may exceed the schools’ ability to meet them at class time mostly due to resource constraints. The implementation of the principle of equal opportunities in education requires continuous improvement of the efficiency of schools’ processes. Evaluation can help qualify tasks for improvement.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe level of engagement (reactive/active) of the school principal and teachers in evaluation and improvement is a crucial factor in overcoming the barriers to the efficiency of the school processes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe ability to respond to the efficiency gaps of the school processes depends on the choice and efficiency of the KEF. The rationale for selecting the function and the schemes for its implementation have paradigmatic grounds.\n","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2022-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the system of factors influencing the efficiency of internal evaluation in Polish secondary schools. Design/methodology/approach Data collected in interviews with evaluation experts and teachers on the barriers to the efficiency of internal evaluation and their causes were subjected to a qualitative cause-and-effect analysis. Findings Five barriers to the evaluation efficiency (6B model) and five actions of the school head stopping their impact (6A model) were identified. The latter include selecting the key evaluation function (3KEF model) and ensuring the conditions for efficiency in the improvement loop. Research limitations/implications Although the research was carried out in Polish schools, the conclusions indicate regularities affecting organizations throughout the world. Practical implications Students’ educational needs may exceed the schools’ ability to meet them at class time mostly due to resource constraints. The implementation of the principle of equal opportunities in education requires continuous improvement of the efficiency of schools’ processes. Evaluation can help qualify tasks for improvement. Social implications The level of engagement (reactive/active) of the school principal and teachers in evaluation and improvement is a crucial factor in overcoming the barriers to the efficiency of the school processes. Originality/value The ability to respond to the efficiency gaps of the school processes depends on the choice and efficiency of the KEF. The rationale for selecting the function and the schemes for its implementation have paradigmatic grounds.
波兰中学内部评估效率的障碍
目的本研究旨在探讨影响波兰中学内部评价效率的因素体系。设计/方法/方法对评估专家和教师访谈中收集的关于内部评估效率障碍及其原因的数据进行了定性因果分析。发现了影响评估效率的五个障碍(6B模型)和校长阻止其影响的五个行为(6A模型)。后者包括选择关键评估函数(3KEF模型)和确保改进循环中效率的条件。研究局限性/含义尽管这项研究是在波兰学校进行的,但结论表明了影响世界各地组织的规律。实际意义学生的教育需求可能超过学校在课堂上满足他们的能力,主要是由于资源限制。要落实教育机会平等原则,就需要不断提高学校程序的效率。评估可以帮助确定需要改进的任务。社会影响校长和教师参与评估和改进的程度(被动/主动)是克服学校流程效率障碍的关键因素。独创性/价值应对学校流程效率差距的能力取决于KEF的选择和效率。选择该功能的基本原理及其实施方案具有典型的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信