The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLİMİK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
S. Şimşek-Yavuz, Selcuk Ozger, Aysun Benli, C. Ateş, M. Aydın, G. Aygun, A. Azap, S. Başaran, N. Demirturk, O. Ergonul, Aysel Kocagul-Celikbas, Ferit Kuşçu, E. M. Saricaoğlu, S. Sayın-Kutlu, N. Turker, Emine Turkoglu-Yilmaz, O. Kurt-Azap
{"title":"The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLİMİK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023","authors":"S. Şimşek-Yavuz, Selcuk Ozger, Aysun Benli, C. Ateş, M. Aydın, G. Aygun, A. Azap, S. Başaran, N. Demirturk, O. Ergonul, Aysel Kocagul-Celikbas, Ferit Kuşçu, E. M. Saricaoğlu, S. Sayın-Kutlu, N. Turker, Emine Turkoglu-Yilmaz, O. Kurt-Azap","doi":"10.36519/kd.2023.4576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Türkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis.\n\nThe recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBİM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.4576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Türkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis. The recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBİM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies.
土耳其临床微生物学和传染病学会(KL伊姆伊克)布鲁氏菌病诊断和治疗循证指南,2023年
虽然布鲁氏菌病在全世界和全世界都很常见,但没有循证指南来指导该病的诊断和治疗。本指南由土耳其临床微生物学和传染病学会编写,旨在向对布鲁氏菌病的诊断和治疗感兴趣的不同专业的医生提供循证建议。本指南以美国传染病学会(IDSA)《临床实践指南发展指南》的建议为基础编写。指南编制组确定了在布鲁氏菌病的诊断和治疗中被认为重要的20个问题,并在ULAKBİM Tr Dizin、PubMed、Cochrane数据库中检索以PICO(人群/患者[P]、干预[I]、比较[C]、结局[O])格式编制的能够回答这些问题的出版物,不受日期限制。建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工作组方法用于对证据进行排序,并确定每个PICO问题和每个单独结果的建议强度。对比较临床研究进行荟萃分析以回答PICO问题。在没有比较临床研究的情况下,进行了个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,数据来自病例报告和病例系列。计划根据新的研究结果定期更新这些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信