New approaches to the propagation of the antifeminist backlash on Twitter

IF 0.5 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Miren Gutiérrez Almazor, M. P. Canteli, M. Congosto
{"title":"New approaches to the propagation of the antifeminist backlash on Twitter","authors":"Miren Gutiérrez Almazor, M. P. Canteli, M. Congosto","doi":"10.5209/infe.66089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A year after the #MeToo movement erupted, antifeminism started to retort. The idea behind the backlash was that ‘the men who have been accused are the heroes’ (Tolentino, 2018). Twitter was one of the public spaces where this confrontation occurred; the #HimToo backlash gathered steam in 2018 (Asimov, 2018) and expanded into 2019. Focussing on the reactions against #Cuéntalo Twitter campaign –the Spanish equivalent to #MeToo—, this article examines how the antifeminist backlash proliferates, offering a view of the dynamics driving it. The authors choose an eclectic and interdisciplinary approach that integrates graph theory and CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis), thus connecting social media formulations with offline discourses, and proposing new ways of studying social movements. To examine the backlash’s characteristics, this study utilises Congosto’s typology of Twitter profiles (Congosto, 2018). Findings suggest that both approaches are complementary and necessary, for while graph analysis enables the distinction of antifeminist communities on Twitter and their behaviour and characteristics, CDA allows investigators to uncover their discursive strategies and favoured themes.","PeriodicalId":43469,"journal":{"name":"Investigaciones Feministas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5209/infe.66089","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigaciones Feministas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.66089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

A year after the #MeToo movement erupted, antifeminism started to retort. The idea behind the backlash was that ‘the men who have been accused are the heroes’ (Tolentino, 2018). Twitter was one of the public spaces where this confrontation occurred; the #HimToo backlash gathered steam in 2018 (Asimov, 2018) and expanded into 2019. Focussing on the reactions against #Cuéntalo Twitter campaign –the Spanish equivalent to #MeToo—, this article examines how the antifeminist backlash proliferates, offering a view of the dynamics driving it. The authors choose an eclectic and interdisciplinary approach that integrates graph theory and CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis), thus connecting social media formulations with offline discourses, and proposing new ways of studying social movements. To examine the backlash’s characteristics, this study utilises Congosto’s typology of Twitter profiles (Congosto, 2018). Findings suggest that both approaches are complementary and necessary, for while graph analysis enables the distinction of antifeminist communities on Twitter and their behaviour and characteristics, CDA allows investigators to uncover their discursive strategies and favoured themes.
在推特上传播反女权主义反弹的新方法
#MeToo运动爆发一年后,反迷你主义开始反驳。反弹背后的想法是“被指控的人才是英雄”(托伦蒂诺,2018)。推特是这场对峙发生的公共场所之一;#HimToo的反弹在2018年愈演愈烈(阿西莫夫,2018),并扩大到2019年。这篇文章聚焦于对#Cuéntalo推特运动(西班牙语中相当于#MeToo)的反应,探讨了反迷你主义者的反弹是如何激增的,并提供了一个驱动它的动力的观点。作者选择了一种折衷的跨学科方法,将图论和CDA(批判性话语分析)相结合,从而将社交媒体公式与线下话语联系起来,并提出研究社会运动的新方法。为了检验反弹的特征,本研究利用了Congosto对推特个人资料的类型学(Congosto,2018)。研究结果表明,这两种方法是互补和必要的,因为虽然图形分析可以区分推特上的反迷你主义社区及其行为和特征,但CDA可以让研究人员揭示他们的话语策略和喜欢的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigaciones Feministas
Investigaciones Feministas WOMENS STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信