Connecting plant phenotyping and modelling communities: lessons from science mapping and operational perspectives

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY
Clément Saint Cast, G. Lobet, Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet, V. Couvreur, C. Pradal, F. Tardieu, X. Draye
{"title":"Connecting plant phenotyping and modelling communities: lessons from science mapping and operational perspectives","authors":"Clément Saint Cast, G. Lobet, Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet, V. Couvreur, C. Pradal, F. Tardieu, X. Draye","doi":"10.1093/insilicoplants/diac005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Plant phenotyping platforms generate large amounts of high dimensional data at different scales of plant organization. The possibility to use this information as inputs of models is an opportunity to develop models that integrate new processes and genetic inputs. We assessed to what extent the phenomics and modelling communities can address the issues of interoperability and data exchange, using a science mapping approach (i.e. visualization and analysis of a broad range of scientific and technological activities as a whole). In this paper, we (i) evaluate connections, (ii) identify compatible and connectable research topics, and (iii) propose strategies to facilitate connection across communities. We applied a science mapping approach based on reference and term analyses to a set of 4332 scientific papers published by the plant phenomics and modelling communities from 1980 to 2019, retrieved using the Elsevier’s Scopus database and the quantitative-plant.org website. The number of papers on phenotyping and modelling dramatically increased during the past decade, boosted by progress in phenotyping technologies and by key developments at hard- and software levels. The science mapping approach indicated a large diversity of research topics studied in each community. Despite compatibilities of research topics, the level of connection between the phenomics and modelling communities was low. Although phenomics and modelling crucially need to exchange data, the two communities appeared to be weakly connected. We encourage these communities to work on ontologies, harmonized formats, translators and connectors to facilitate transparent data exchange.","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diac005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Plant phenotyping platforms generate large amounts of high dimensional data at different scales of plant organization. The possibility to use this information as inputs of models is an opportunity to develop models that integrate new processes and genetic inputs. We assessed to what extent the phenomics and modelling communities can address the issues of interoperability and data exchange, using a science mapping approach (i.e. visualization and analysis of a broad range of scientific and technological activities as a whole). In this paper, we (i) evaluate connections, (ii) identify compatible and connectable research topics, and (iii) propose strategies to facilitate connection across communities. We applied a science mapping approach based on reference and term analyses to a set of 4332 scientific papers published by the plant phenomics and modelling communities from 1980 to 2019, retrieved using the Elsevier’s Scopus database and the quantitative-plant.org website. The number of papers on phenotyping and modelling dramatically increased during the past decade, boosted by progress in phenotyping technologies and by key developments at hard- and software levels. The science mapping approach indicated a large diversity of research topics studied in each community. Despite compatibilities of research topics, the level of connection between the phenomics and modelling communities was low. Although phenomics and modelling crucially need to exchange data, the two communities appeared to be weakly connected. We encourage these communities to work on ontologies, harmonized formats, translators and connectors to facilitate transparent data exchange.
连接植物表型和建模社区:来自科学制图和操作角度的经验教训
植物表型平台在植物组织的不同尺度上产生大量的高维数据。使用这些信息作为模型输入的可能性是开发集成新过程和遗传输入的模型的机会。我们评估了表型组学和建模社区使用科学制图方法(即对广泛的科学和技术活动作为一个整体进行可视化和分析)在多大程度上可以解决互操作性和数据交换问题。在本文中,我们(i)评估连接,(ii)确定兼容和可连接的研究主题,以及(iii)提出促进跨社区连接的策略。我们采用了一种基于参考文献和术语分析的科学制图方法,对1980年至2019年期间由植物表型组学和建模社区发表的4332篇科学论文进行了检索,这些论文使用爱思唯尔的Scopus数据库和定量植物网站进行检索。在过去的十年中,由于表型技术的进步和硬件和软件水平的关键发展,关于表型和建模的论文数量急剧增加。科学制图方法表明,每个社区研究的研究课题存在很大的多样性。尽管研究课题具有兼容性,但表型组学和建模群落之间的联系水平较低。尽管表型组学和建模至关重要地需要交换数据,但这两个群体之间的联系似乎很弱。我们鼓励这些社区在本体、统一格式、翻译器和连接器方面开展工作,以促进透明的数据交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信