New realism: contemporary British cinema

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
N. Morris
{"title":"New realism: contemporary British cinema","authors":"N. Morris","doi":"10.1080/17411548.2022.2073769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"symbolic for the entire crisis of white masculinity. Just like the white male protagonists of the films analysed in previous chapters, these ‘angry old men,’ having been abandoned by the malfunctioning or withdrawing modern state, feel that ‘the world has changed and is no longer accommodating, comfortable or home-like’ (250) for them. On the one hand, the films in this batch – Tyrannosaur (Paddy Considine, 2011), I, Daniel Blake (Ken Loach, 2016) and En man som heter Ove/A Man Called Ove (Hannes Holm, 2015) – still display potentially damaging aspects of masculinity, while also suggesting more productive channels of resentment and frustration – but only via women who are willing to help. In a talk about the book, Kalmár pointed to its cover. At first glance, a homogeneous reddish-brown, a solid colour taken for granted and unmarked by any possible meaning attribution; but if observed more carefully, it turns out that the cover mimics the rich, multilayered texture of a rusty piece of iron, a leftover of a decaying, post-industrial society, giving a complex and powerful metaphor for understanding the situation of white men in crisis. ‘This rust remains with us,’ Kalmár contended, referring to the fact that new solutions are still needed for coping with the new questions regarding white masculinity, but also hinting at the un-postness of the title’s ‘post-crisis’ expression. The crisis has just begun and we are by no means through it. Even though it seems like a permanent state now, we are just beginning to make sense of what this new episteme might entail for us. That is why Kalmár is hesitant to draw solid conclusions at the end of his work. Instead, he mentions a few trends in European culture and film that might be able to characterise this new world order, but none of them would suggest that it is possible to find final answers. According to Kalmár, post-crisis Europe is characterised by a hostility towards historical metanarratives, and closely related to it, he identifies a new wave of more informed heroism in films, and also as a response to the first claim, ‘a new tendency of post-crisis European films to turn their attention back to the European self’ (264). One thing is certain, though: intellectuals and professional readers of (European) culture are going to play a central role and have a huge responsibility in making sense of what Kalmár convincingly argues is indeed a new paradigm. For the sake of white men – and everyone else, too.","PeriodicalId":42089,"journal":{"name":"Studies in European Cinema","volume":"20 1","pages":"218 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2022.2073769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

symbolic for the entire crisis of white masculinity. Just like the white male protagonists of the films analysed in previous chapters, these ‘angry old men,’ having been abandoned by the malfunctioning or withdrawing modern state, feel that ‘the world has changed and is no longer accommodating, comfortable or home-like’ (250) for them. On the one hand, the films in this batch – Tyrannosaur (Paddy Considine, 2011), I, Daniel Blake (Ken Loach, 2016) and En man som heter Ove/A Man Called Ove (Hannes Holm, 2015) – still display potentially damaging aspects of masculinity, while also suggesting more productive channels of resentment and frustration – but only via women who are willing to help. In a talk about the book, Kalmár pointed to its cover. At first glance, a homogeneous reddish-brown, a solid colour taken for granted and unmarked by any possible meaning attribution; but if observed more carefully, it turns out that the cover mimics the rich, multilayered texture of a rusty piece of iron, a leftover of a decaying, post-industrial society, giving a complex and powerful metaphor for understanding the situation of white men in crisis. ‘This rust remains with us,’ Kalmár contended, referring to the fact that new solutions are still needed for coping with the new questions regarding white masculinity, but also hinting at the un-postness of the title’s ‘post-crisis’ expression. The crisis has just begun and we are by no means through it. Even though it seems like a permanent state now, we are just beginning to make sense of what this new episteme might entail for us. That is why Kalmár is hesitant to draw solid conclusions at the end of his work. Instead, he mentions a few trends in European culture and film that might be able to characterise this new world order, but none of them would suggest that it is possible to find final answers. According to Kalmár, post-crisis Europe is characterised by a hostility towards historical metanarratives, and closely related to it, he identifies a new wave of more informed heroism in films, and also as a response to the first claim, ‘a new tendency of post-crisis European films to turn their attention back to the European self’ (264). One thing is certain, though: intellectuals and professional readers of (European) culture are going to play a central role and have a huge responsibility in making sense of what Kalmár convincingly argues is indeed a new paradigm. For the sake of white men – and everyone else, too.
新现实主义:当代英国电影
象征着白人男子气概的整个危机。就像前几章分析的电影中的白人男主角一样,这些“愤怒的老人”被失灵或退缩的现代国家抛弃了,他们觉得“世界已经改变了,对他们来说不再是包容、舒适或家一样的了”(250)。一方面,这一批电影——《暴龙》(Paddy Considine,2011)、《我》、《丹尼尔·布莱克》(Ken Loach,2016)和《恩曼·索姆·奥维/一个叫奥维的男人》(Hannes Holm,2015)——仍然展示了男性气概的潜在破坏性方面,同时也暗示了更有效的怨恨和沮丧渠道——但只有通过愿意帮助的女性。在一次关于这本书的谈话中,卡尔马尔指着书的封面。乍一看,这是一种均匀的红棕色,一种被视为理所当然的纯色,没有任何可能的意义归属;但如果仔细观察,发现封面模仿了一块生锈的铁的丰富、多层纹理,这是一个腐朽的后工业社会的残余,为理解处于危机中的白人的处境提供了一个复杂而有力的隐喻Kalmár认为,这种铁锈仍然存在,他指的是仍然需要新的解决方案来应对有关白人男子气概的新问题,但也暗示了标题中“后危机”表达的不确定性。危机才刚刚开始,我们还没有度过。尽管现在它看起来像是一个永久性的状态,但我们才刚刚开始理解这种新的认识可能对我们意味着什么。这就是为什么卡尔马尔在工作结束时犹豫是否要得出实实在在的结论。相反,他提到了欧洲文化和电影中的一些趋势,这些趋势可能能够描述这种新的世界秩序,但没有一个表明有可能找到最终答案。Kalmár认为,危机后的欧洲以对历史元叙事的敌意为特征,与之密切相关的是,他认为电影中出现了新一轮更具见地的英雄主义,也是对第一种说法的回应,即“危机后欧洲电影将注意力转向欧洲自我的新趋势”(264)。不过,有一点是肯定的:知识分子和(欧洲)文化的专业读者将发挥核心作用,并在理解卡尔马尔令人信服地认为的确实是一种新范式方面承担巨大责任。为了白人,也为了其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in European Cinema
Studies in European Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信