Hebrew Law as a Source for Conciliation and Mediation in Supreme Court Decisions: The Legacy of Justice Elyakim Rubinstein

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Israel Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2979/israelstudies.27.1.09

Ehud Eiran

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The article examines Justice Elyakim Rubinstein's approach to compromise in the judicial process, based mainly on his judicial record on the Israeli Supreme Court bench, (2004–2017) but also on his speeches and publications. The two arguments advanced here are first, that Justice Rubinstein believed in compromise (rather than adjudication) as the preferred outcome of the legal process; and second, that according to his reading of Hebrew Law, compromise is justified by more than utility, efficiency, and benefit to the common good. The article likewise considers the limits and shortcomings of Rubinstein's approach, and the manner in which he mitigated some of them.

查看原文本刊更多论文

希伯来法作为最高法院裁决中调解和调解的来源:大法官伊利亚基姆·鲁宾斯坦的遗产

摘要:本文主要以鲁宾斯坦法官2004年至2017年在以色列最高法院任职期间的司法记录以及他的演讲和出版物为基础，考察鲁宾斯坦法官在司法过程中的妥协方式。这里提出的两个论点是:第一，鲁宾斯坦法官相信妥协(而不是裁决)是法律程序的首选结果;第二，根据他对希伯来律法的解读，妥协的理由不仅仅是效用、效率和对共同利益的好处。本文同样考虑了鲁宾斯坦方法的局限性和缺点，以及他减轻其中一些缺点的方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Israel Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Israel Studies presents multidisciplinary scholarship on Israeli history, politics, society, and culture. Each issue includes essays and reports on matters of broad interest reflecting diverse points of view. Temporal boundaries extend to the pre-state period, although emphasis is on the State of Israel. Due recognition is also given to events and phenomena in diaspora communities as they affect the Israeli state. It is sponsored by the Ben-Gurion Research Institute for the Study of Israel and Zionism at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and the Schusterman Center for Israel Studies at Brandeis University, in affiliation with the Association for Israel Studies.