US Black Maternal Health Advocacy Topics and Trends on Twitter: Temporal Infoveillance Study

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.2196/30885
D. Grigsby-Toussaint, Ashley Champagne, Justin Uhr, Elizabeth Silva, Madeline Noh, Adam Bradley, Patrick Rashleigh
{"title":"US Black Maternal Health Advocacy Topics and Trends on Twitter: Temporal Infoveillance Study","authors":"D. Grigsby-Toussaint, Ashley Champagne, Justin Uhr, Elizabeth Silva, Madeline Noh, Adam Bradley, Patrick Rashleigh","doi":"10.2196/30885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Black women in the United States disproportionately suffer adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes compared to White women. Economic adversity and implicit bias during clinical encounters may lead to physiological responses that place Black women at higher risk for adverse birth outcomes. The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) further exacerbated this risk, as safety protocols increased social isolation in clinical settings, thereby limiting opportunities to advocate for unbiased care. Twitter, 1 of the most popular social networking sites, has been used to study a variety of issues of public interest, including health care. This study considers whether posts on Twitter accurately reflect public discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic and are being used in infodemiology studies by public health experts. Objective This study aims to assess the feasibility of Twitter for identifying public discourse related to social determinants of health and advocacy that influence maternal health among Black women across the United States and to examine trends in sentiment between 2019 and 2020 in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Tweets were collected from March 1 to July 13, 2020, from 21 organizations and influencers and from 4 hashtags that focused on Black maternal health. Additionally, tweets from the same organizations and hashtags were collected from the year prior, from March 1 to July 13, 2019. Twint, a Python programming library, was used for data collection and analysis. We gathered the text of approximately 17,000 tweets, as well as all publicly available metadata. Topic modeling and k-means clustering were used to analyze the tweets. Results A variety of trends were observed when comparing the 2020 data set to the 2019 data set from the same period. The percentages listed for each topic are probabilities of that topic occurring in our corpus. In our topic models, tweets on reproductive justice, maternal mortality crises, and patient care increased by 67.46% in 2020 versus 2019. Topics on community, advocacy, and health equity increased by over 30% in 2020 versus 2019. In contrast, tweet topics that decreased in 2020 versus 2019 were as follows: tweets on Medicaid and medical coverage decreased by 27.73%, and discussions about creating space for Black women decreased by just under 30%. Conclusions The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic may have spurred an increased focus on advocating for improved reproductive health and maternal health outcomes among Black women in the United States. Further analyses are needed to capture a longer time frame that encompasses more of the pandemic, as well as more diverse voices to confirm the robustness of the findings. We also concluded that Twitter is an effective source for providing a snapshot of relevant topics to guide Black maternal health advocacy efforts.","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/30885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Black women in the United States disproportionately suffer adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes compared to White women. Economic adversity and implicit bias during clinical encounters may lead to physiological responses that place Black women at higher risk for adverse birth outcomes. The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) further exacerbated this risk, as safety protocols increased social isolation in clinical settings, thereby limiting opportunities to advocate for unbiased care. Twitter, 1 of the most popular social networking sites, has been used to study a variety of issues of public interest, including health care. This study considers whether posts on Twitter accurately reflect public discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic and are being used in infodemiology studies by public health experts. Objective This study aims to assess the feasibility of Twitter for identifying public discourse related to social determinants of health and advocacy that influence maternal health among Black women across the United States and to examine trends in sentiment between 2019 and 2020 in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Tweets were collected from March 1 to July 13, 2020, from 21 organizations and influencers and from 4 hashtags that focused on Black maternal health. Additionally, tweets from the same organizations and hashtags were collected from the year prior, from March 1 to July 13, 2019. Twint, a Python programming library, was used for data collection and analysis. We gathered the text of approximately 17,000 tweets, as well as all publicly available metadata. Topic modeling and k-means clustering were used to analyze the tweets. Results A variety of trends were observed when comparing the 2020 data set to the 2019 data set from the same period. The percentages listed for each topic are probabilities of that topic occurring in our corpus. In our topic models, tweets on reproductive justice, maternal mortality crises, and patient care increased by 67.46% in 2020 versus 2019. Topics on community, advocacy, and health equity increased by over 30% in 2020 versus 2019. In contrast, tweet topics that decreased in 2020 versus 2019 were as follows: tweets on Medicaid and medical coverage decreased by 27.73%, and discussions about creating space for Black women decreased by just under 30%. Conclusions The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic may have spurred an increased focus on advocating for improved reproductive health and maternal health outcomes among Black women in the United States. Further analyses are needed to capture a longer time frame that encompasses more of the pandemic, as well as more diverse voices to confirm the robustness of the findings. We also concluded that Twitter is an effective source for providing a snapshot of relevant topics to guide Black maternal health advocacy efforts.
推特上的美国黑人孕产妇健康倡导主题和趋势:时间信息监测研究
与白人妇女相比,美国黑人妇女遭受不良妊娠和分娩结果的比例过高。临床接触中的经济逆境和隐性偏见可能导致生理反应,使黑人妇女面临更高的不良分娩结果风险。2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进一步加剧了这一风险,因为安全协议增加了临床环境中的社会隔离,从而限制了倡导公正护理的机会。Twitter是最受欢迎的社交网站之一,它被用来研究各种公众感兴趣的问题,包括医疗保健。这项研究考虑了推特上的帖子是否准确地反映了COVID-19大流行期间的公众话语,并被公共卫生专家用于信息流行病学研究。本研究旨在评估Twitter在识别与影响美国黑人女性孕产妇健康的健康社会决定因素和宣传相关的公共话语方面的可行性,并研究2019年至2020年在COVID-19大流行背景下的情绪趋势。方法收集2020年3月1日至7月13日期间来自21个组织和影响者以及4个关注黑人孕产妇健康的标签的推文。此外,从2019年3月1日到7月13日,收集了来自相同组织和标签的推文。使用Python编程库Twint进行数据收集和分析。我们收集了大约17,000条推文的文本,以及所有公开可用的元数据。使用主题建模和k-means聚类对推文进行分析。结果对比2020年和2019年的同期数据,发现了多种趋势。每个主题列出的百分比是该主题在语料库中出现的概率。在我们的主题模型中,与2019年相比,2020年关于生殖正义、孕产妇死亡危机和患者护理的推文增加了67.46%。与2019年相比,2020年有关社区、宣传和卫生公平的主题增加了30%以上。相比之下,2020年与2019年相比,推特话题减少如下:关于医疗补助和医疗覆盖的推文减少了27.73%,关于为黑人女性创造空间的讨论减少了不到30%。研究结果表明,2019冠状病毒病大流行可能促使人们更加关注倡导改善美国黑人女性的生殖健康和孕产妇健康结果。需要进一步分析,以涵盖更长的时间框架,涵盖更多的大流行时期,并需要更多样化的声音,以确认调查结果的稳健性。我们还得出结论,Twitter是提供相关主题快照的有效来源,可以指导黑人孕产妇健康宣传工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信