Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement by Specular Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography, Optical Biometry and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes

Rubble Mangla, Nitin Batra, Gurvinder Kaur, Tanisha Mittal, Reenu Thomas
{"title":"Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement by Specular Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography, Optical Biometry and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes","authors":"Rubble Mangla, Nitin Batra, Gurvinder Kaur, Tanisha Mittal, Reenu Thomas","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i5.400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nPrecise central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement is of utmost importance in various corneal diseases and refractive procedures. Various methods are available to measure CCT. But studies comparing CCT measurements with different devices have shown variable results. This study compares the CCT measurements by different devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry (USP). \nMETHODS \nThis prospective study that was conducted from October 2017 to June 2019 included 100 subjects aged more than 18 years and CCT was measured by non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), optical biometry (OB) and USP in normal eyes. For every patient and with each device, three readings were taken and an average was recorded. The data recorded per protocol was analyzed using Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. \nRESULTS \nThe mean value of CCT with NCSM, SD-OCT, OB, USP was 528.98±32.18µm, 532.64±30.49µm, 517.47±31.89µm and 533.39±33.44µm, respectively. The intraclass correlation was found to be maximum between NCSM and USP (0.953, p<0.001). The mean paired difference of CCT values with SD-OCT and USP was statistically insignificant (-0.75±14.73, p=1.00) whereas the difference obtained with all other devices was statistically significant. \nCONCLUSIONS \nA statistically significant positive correlation (p<0.001) was observed on comparing all the four devices with each other for measurement of CCT. The OCT had the best agreement and also positively correlated with USP. Hence, we conclude that OCT can be an effective alternative to USP for measuring CCT.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i5.400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Precise central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement is of utmost importance in various corneal diseases and refractive procedures. Various methods are available to measure CCT. But studies comparing CCT measurements with different devices have shown variable results. This study compares the CCT measurements by different devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry (USP). METHODS This prospective study that was conducted from October 2017 to June 2019 included 100 subjects aged more than 18 years and CCT was measured by non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), optical biometry (OB) and USP in normal eyes. For every patient and with each device, three readings were taken and an average was recorded. The data recorded per protocol was analyzed using Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS The mean value of CCT with NCSM, SD-OCT, OB, USP was 528.98±32.18µm, 532.64±30.49µm, 517.47±31.89µm and 533.39±33.44µm, respectively. The intraclass correlation was found to be maximum between NCSM and USP (0.953, p<0.001). The mean paired difference of CCT values with SD-OCT and USP was statistically insignificant (-0.75±14.73, p=1.00) whereas the difference obtained with all other devices was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS A statistically significant positive correlation (p<0.001) was observed on comparing all the four devices with each other for measurement of CCT. The OCT had the best agreement and also positively correlated with USP. Hence, we conclude that OCT can be an effective alternative to USP for measuring CCT.
光学相干层析成像、光学生物测量和超声测厚法测量正常眼角膜中央厚度的比较
背景角膜中央厚度(CCT)的精确测量在各种角膜疾病和屈光手术中至关重要。有多种方法可用于测量CCT。但将CCT测量值与不同设备进行比较的研究显示,结果各不相同。本研究比较了不同设备和超声波测厚仪(USP)测量的CCT。方法这项前瞻性研究于2017年10月至2019年6月进行,包括100名年龄在18岁以上的受试者,通过非接触镜面显微镜(NCSM)、光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)、光学生物测量(OB)和USP测量正常眼的CCT。对于每名患者和每台设备,读取三个读数并记录平均值。根据方案记录的数据使用组内相关系数和Bland-Altman分析进行分析。结果NCSM、SD-OCT、OB和USP的CCT平均值分别为528.98±32.18µm、532.64±30.49µm、517.47±31.89µm和533.39±33.44µm。NCSM和USP之间的组内相关性最大(0.953,p<0.001)。SD-OCT和USP的CCT值的平均配对差异在统计学上不显著(-0.75±14.73,p=1.00),而所有其他设备的差异在统计学意义上显著。结论在比较所有四种装置的CCT测量时,观察到统计学上显著的正相关(p<0.001)。OCT具有最佳一致性,并且与USP呈正相关。因此,我们得出结论,OCT可以作为USP测量CCT的有效替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信