C. Beasley, Daniel B. Parvaz, L. Cotton, K. Littler
{"title":"Liberating microfossils from indurated carbonates: comparison of three disaggregation methods","authors":"C. Beasley, Daniel B. Parvaz, L. Cotton, K. Littler","doi":"10.5194/jm-39-169-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Three disaggregation methods, i.e. Calgon, acetic acid and electric\npulse fragmentation (EPF), have been applied to a range of heavily\nlithified, carbonate-rich sedimentary rock samples of Paleogene age. Samples\nare predominantly from the carbonate-rich, shallow water domain ( m palaeo-water depth) of Tanzania, Malta and the United Arab Emirates\n(Paleogene Tethys Ocean). The effectiveness and efficiency of each method\nhas been compared, in addition to the preservation of the resultant liberated\nmicrofossil material (primarily larger foraminifera; LF). Of the three\nmethods, the most efficient and effective was EPF, which liberated the\nlargest number of LF in a very short processing time and resulted in the\nbest preservation. Samples with calcitic, silicic, and clay matrices and\ncements were successfully disaggregated using EPF. In this study, recovered\nmicrofossils were largely >500 µ m, suggesting this\ntechnique may be more appropriate for liberating larger microfossils (e.g.\nLFs); however, we discuss nuances to the method that would allow for more\neffective recovery of smaller microfossil specimens. The more traditional\nacetic acid method was also able to disaggregate a number of the samples;\nhowever, preservation of the LF was compromised. We suggest a best-practice\nmethodology for implementing EPF in micropalaeontological studies.","PeriodicalId":54786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Micropalaeontology","volume":"39 1","pages":"169-181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Micropalaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-169-2020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. Three disaggregation methods, i.e. Calgon, acetic acid and electric
pulse fragmentation (EPF), have been applied to a range of heavily
lithified, carbonate-rich sedimentary rock samples of Paleogene age. Samples
are predominantly from the carbonate-rich, shallow water domain ( m palaeo-water depth) of Tanzania, Malta and the United Arab Emirates
(Paleogene Tethys Ocean). The effectiveness and efficiency of each method
has been compared, in addition to the preservation of the resultant liberated
microfossil material (primarily larger foraminifera; LF). Of the three
methods, the most efficient and effective was EPF, which liberated the
largest number of LF in a very short processing time and resulted in the
best preservation. Samples with calcitic, silicic, and clay matrices and
cements were successfully disaggregated using EPF. In this study, recovered
microfossils were largely >500 µ m, suggesting this
technique may be more appropriate for liberating larger microfossils (e.g.
LFs); however, we discuss nuances to the method that would allow for more
effective recovery of smaller microfossil specimens. The more traditional
acetic acid method was also able to disaggregate a number of the samples;
however, preservation of the LF was compromised. We suggest a best-practice
methodology for implementing EPF in micropalaeontological studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Micropalaeontology (JM) is an established international journal covering all aspects of microfossils and their application to both applied studies and basic research. In particular we welcome submissions relating to microfossils and their application to palaeoceanography, palaeoclimatology, palaeobiology, evolution, taxonomy, environmental change and molecular phylogeny.