Nathalina Naibaho, H. Harkrisnowo, Suhariyono Ar, M. Wibisana
{"title":"CRIMINISTRATIVE LAW: DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN INDONESIA","authors":"Nathalina Naibaho, H. Harkrisnowo, Suhariyono Ar, M. Wibisana","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V11N1.647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The borderlines between core criminal law and administrative law developed in such a way that it became increasingly difficult to draw a clear and a firm category while dividing line between those. The category of a measure as administrative or criminal is far from being theoretical as it preconditions the applicable legal regime and especially the level of procedural safeguards benefiting to those sanctioned. This paper is questioning the gray area belonging to something in between criminal and administrative law and discussing the rule and the role of criminal law and administrative law in action when the later comprehend punitive administrative sanctions. Several circumstances need to be considered in order to determine the appropriate sanction to fill the gap. This article also suggests the use of “una via principle” as an approach to unpack the gray area in the role of criminal and administrative law, specifically in tax law case.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V11N1.647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The borderlines between core criminal law and administrative law developed in such a way that it became increasingly difficult to draw a clear and a firm category while dividing line between those. The category of a measure as administrative or criminal is far from being theoretical as it preconditions the applicable legal regime and especially the level of procedural safeguards benefiting to those sanctioned. This paper is questioning the gray area belonging to something in between criminal and administrative law and discussing the rule and the role of criminal law and administrative law in action when the later comprehend punitive administrative sanctions. Several circumstances need to be considered in order to determine the appropriate sanction to fill the gap. This article also suggests the use of “una via principle” as an approach to unpack the gray area in the role of criminal and administrative law, specifically in tax law case.
核心刑法和行政法之间的边界线是这样发展的,以至于在划分这些法律的同时,越来越难以划出一个明确而坚定的类别。行政措施或刑事措施的类别远不是理论上的,因为它是适用法律制度的先决条件,尤其是有利于被制裁者的程序保障水平。本文对刑法与行政法之间的灰色地带提出了质疑,并探讨了刑法和行政法在事后理解惩罚性行政处罚时的规则和作用。为了确定填补空白的适当制裁措施,需要考虑几种情况。本文还建议使用“una via principle”来打开刑法和行政法作用的灰色地带,特别是在税法案件中。