Evaluation of Perception, Knowledge and Attitudes of Anesthesia Healthcare Workers on Occupational Health and Safety

Q4 Medicine
Nejdiye Gungordu, Hazal Cansu Çulpan, H. Yılmaz Ak, Yasemin Ozsahin, Seher Kurtul, A. Nizamoğlu, Y. Dikmen, Fatiş Altındaş, M. S. Erdoğan
{"title":"Evaluation of Perception, Knowledge and Attitudes of Anesthesia Healthcare Workers on Occupational Health and Safety","authors":"Nejdiye Gungordu, Hazal Cansu Çulpan, H. Yılmaz Ak, Yasemin Ozsahin, Seher Kurtul, A. Nizamoğlu, Y. Dikmen, Fatiş Altındaş, M. S. Erdoğan","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.26122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anesthesia healthcare workers work under more intense hazard, risk and excessive workload specific to their field, in addition to the problems of other healthcare workers. This study aims to identify perception of occupational risks in the working environment, knowledge about occupational health and safety (OHS), and the use of personal protective equipment in the working environment among the anesthesia healthcare workers. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted with 153 anesthesia healthcare workers. The healthcare workers participating in the study were divided into 2 groups according to their work: physicians and non-physician healthcare workers. The questionnaire included sociodemographic, knowledge about occupational risks and Occupational Health and Safety Law (OHSL), use of personal protective equipment and knowledge of OHS in the institution questions. Results: The frequencies of the working conditions and professional practice areas of the group of doctors being not ergonomically appropriate (p=0.005), insufficient lighting (p=0.001), insufficient heat (p<0.015), chemical agent exposure (p=0.024), ionizing radiation exposure (p=0.003), exposure to biological agents (p=0.022), exposure to psychological risk factors (p=0.017) were found to be statistically significantly higher. In this study, it was found that the perception of working environment conditions and occupational risk factors was higher in doctors, and their knowledge of OHSL and OHS practices in the institution was higher in the non-physician group. Conclusion: The OHS trainings received by the health care workers were effective for the results. Increasing knowledge about occupational risks and preventive measures against them can reduce the incidence and consequences of possible occupational diseases. Keywords: Anesthesia, occupational health, occupational safety","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.26122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anesthesia healthcare workers work under more intense hazard, risk and excessive workload specific to their field, in addition to the problems of other healthcare workers. This study aims to identify perception of occupational risks in the working environment, knowledge about occupational health and safety (OHS), and the use of personal protective equipment in the working environment among the anesthesia healthcare workers. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted with 153 anesthesia healthcare workers. The healthcare workers participating in the study were divided into 2 groups according to their work: physicians and non-physician healthcare workers. The questionnaire included sociodemographic, knowledge about occupational risks and Occupational Health and Safety Law (OHSL), use of personal protective equipment and knowledge of OHS in the institution questions. Results: The frequencies of the working conditions and professional practice areas of the group of doctors being not ergonomically appropriate (p=0.005), insufficient lighting (p=0.001), insufficient heat (p<0.015), chemical agent exposure (p=0.024), ionizing radiation exposure (p=0.003), exposure to biological agents (p=0.022), exposure to psychological risk factors (p=0.017) were found to be statistically significantly higher. In this study, it was found that the perception of working environment conditions and occupational risk factors was higher in doctors, and their knowledge of OHSL and OHS practices in the institution was higher in the non-physician group. Conclusion: The OHS trainings received by the health care workers were effective for the results. Increasing knowledge about occupational risks and preventive measures against them can reduce the incidence and consequences of possible occupational diseases. Keywords: Anesthesia, occupational health, occupational safety
麻醉医护人员职业健康安全认知、知识和态度的评价
目的:麻醉卫生保健工作者除了面临其他卫生保健工作者的问题外,还面临着更大的危害、风险和工作负荷过重。本研究旨在了解麻醉医护人员对工作环境中职业风险的认知、职业健康与安全知识以及工作环境中个人防护装备的使用情况。方法:对153名麻醉医护人员进行描述性研究。参与研究的医护人员按其工作分为医师和非医师两组。问卷内容包括社会人口学、职业风险知识和职业健康安全法(OHSL)、个人防护装备的使用情况以及机构职业健康安全知识。结果:本组医生工作条件和执业领域不符合人体工效学(p=0.005)、光照不足(p=0.001)、发热不足(p<0.015)、化学制剂暴露(p=0.024)、电离辐射暴露(p=0.003)、生物制剂暴露(p=0.022)、心理危险因素暴露(p=0.017)的频率均有统计学意义。本研究发现,医生对工作环境条件和职业危险因素的认知高于非医生群体,其对机构职业健康安全知识和职业健康安全实践的认知高于非医生群体。结论:卫生工作者接受的职业健康安全培训效果良好。提高对职业风险和预防措施的认识,可以减少可能的职业病的发病率和后果。关键词:麻醉,职业卫生,职业安全
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信