The European Union after the Crisis: Risks and Opportunities—The Problem of “Uncomfortable Knowledge” and “Institutionalised Forgetfulness”

Joseph (Jože) Straus
{"title":"The European Union after the Crisis: Risks and Opportunities—The Problem of “Uncomfortable Knowledge” and “Institutionalised Forgetfulness”","authors":"Joseph (Jože) Straus","doi":"10.51940/2022.1.9-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis caused by the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes the most serious challenge for Europe since World War II. The crisis threatens Europe’s security and economy to an unprecedented level. No prediction on when and how the crisis will end is possible. However, irrespective of its end, there is no doubt that for Europe, it will generate costs amounting to several hundreds of billions if not even some trillions of Euros, i.e. seriously harm and weaken the European economy and endanger Europe’s position as a global economic power. It will also result in fundamental changes of international economic and political relations. Searching for, working on and designing rational and effective solutions to successfully master the aftermath of the crisis politically and economically should have a priority for the European Union, coming next only to the incredibly challenging efforts to master the ongoing crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic as well as the war in Ukraine caught the EU by surprise and unprepared. Europe should avoid such an experience in the future. Regardless of how this crisis will end, mastering\nits aftermath and identifying the respective risks and opportunities of the EU will have to start with identifying the main beneficiary(ies) of the crisis and analysing its (their) treatment of the EU and its Member States before and during the crisis. This will not be possible by limiting the actions to the day-to-day business, such as finding new suppliers for raw materials and energy, harmonising fiscal rules, providing the necessary funds to\nmaster the financial crisis, etc. A much broader visionary approach will be necessary to find solutions for sustainable peace in Europe. An outcome such as that of the Treaty of Versailles should be avoided. One should prevent the “sleepwalkers” of today, i.e. those ignoring the “uncomfortable knowledge”, letting Europe slide into World War III. The\nEU should make it clear to all of its Members, for Europe, the “European Solidarity’, with all of its attributes, constitutes the core of the EU’s genuine interests, including those of security and defence. This will require also amendments of the TEU and TFEU discussed in this paper. Otherwise, the EU and its Members will never acquire the status of an equal animal—in the global context—i.e. become truly sovereign and independent.","PeriodicalId":31385,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51940/2022.1.9-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The crisis caused by the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes the most serious challenge for Europe since World War II. The crisis threatens Europe’s security and economy to an unprecedented level. No prediction on when and how the crisis will end is possible. However, irrespective of its end, there is no doubt that for Europe, it will generate costs amounting to several hundreds of billions if not even some trillions of Euros, i.e. seriously harm and weaken the European economy and endanger Europe’s position as a global economic power. It will also result in fundamental changes of international economic and political relations. Searching for, working on and designing rational and effective solutions to successfully master the aftermath of the crisis politically and economically should have a priority for the European Union, coming next only to the incredibly challenging efforts to master the ongoing crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic as well as the war in Ukraine caught the EU by surprise and unprepared. Europe should avoid such an experience in the future. Regardless of how this crisis will end, mastering its aftermath and identifying the respective risks and opportunities of the EU will have to start with identifying the main beneficiary(ies) of the crisis and analysing its (their) treatment of the EU and its Member States before and during the crisis. This will not be possible by limiting the actions to the day-to-day business, such as finding new suppliers for raw materials and energy, harmonising fiscal rules, providing the necessary funds to master the financial crisis, etc. A much broader visionary approach will be necessary to find solutions for sustainable peace in Europe. An outcome such as that of the Treaty of Versailles should be avoided. One should prevent the “sleepwalkers” of today, i.e. those ignoring the “uncomfortable knowledge”, letting Europe slide into World War III. The EU should make it clear to all of its Members, for Europe, the “European Solidarity’, with all of its attributes, constitutes the core of the EU’s genuine interests, including those of security and defence. This will require also amendments of the TEU and TFEU discussed in this paper. Otherwise, the EU and its Members will never acquire the status of an equal animal—in the global context—i.e. become truly sovereign and independent.
危机后的欧盟:风险与机遇——“不舒服的知识”与“制度化遗忘”问题
乌克兰战争和新冠肺炎大流行引发的危机是欧洲自第二次世界大战以来面临的最严峻挑战。这场危机对欧洲安全和经济的威胁达到了前所未有的程度。无法预测这场危机何时以及如何结束。然而,无论其目的如何,毫无疑问,对欧洲来说,它将产生数千亿甚至数万亿欧元的成本,即严重损害和削弱欧洲经济,危及欧洲作为全球经济大国的地位。它还将导致国际经济和政治关系的根本变化。寻找、制定和设计合理有效的解决方案,以在政治和经济上成功地控制危机的后果,这应该是欧盟的优先事项,仅次于控制当前危机的难以置信的挑战。2019冠状病毒病大流行和乌克兰战争让欧盟措手不及。欧洲将来应该避免这样的经历。无论这场危机将如何结束,掌握其后果并确定欧盟各自的风险和机遇将不得不从确定危机的主要受益者开始,并分析其在危机前和危机期间对欧盟及其成员国的待遇。如果把行动局限于日常业务,比如寻找新的原材料和能源供应商、协调财政规则、提供必要的资金以应对金融危机等,这是不可能实现的。要为欧洲的可持续和平找到解决办法,就必须采取更广泛、更有远见的做法。应该避免出现像《凡尔赛条约》那样的结果。我们应该防止今天的“梦游者”,即那些忽视“令人不安的知识”的人,让欧洲滑向第三次世界大战。欧盟应该向所有成员国明确表示,对于欧洲来说,“欧洲团结”及其所有属性构成了欧盟真正利益的核心,包括安全和防务利益。这也需要对本文讨论的TEU和TFEU进行修订。否则,欧盟及其成员国将永远无法在全球范围内获得平等动物的地位。成为真正的主权和独立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信